In Facebook Deal, Board Was All But Out of Picture
online.wsj.com
In Facebook Deal, Board Was All But Out of Picture
1–10 of 54 posts
Re: In Facebook Deal, Board Was All But Out of Picture
#2Stupid pay wall.
Re: In Facebook Deal, Board Was All But Out of Picture
#3Stupid pay wall.
To view any WSJ article, search Google News for the exact title. WSJ has a deal with Google to let visitors view the entire article.
Re: In Facebook Deal, Board Was All But Out of Picture
#4Take that, John McCain. What a MAVERICK!
Re: In Facebook Deal, Board Was All But Out of Picture
#5Re: In Facebook Deal, Board Was All But Out of Picture
#6Stupid pay wall.
To view any WSJ article, search Google News for the exact title. WSJ has a deal with Google to let visitors view the entire article.
Re: In Facebook Deal, Board Was All But Out of Picture
#7Well, this has been evident for a long time. Mark Zuckerberg intends to rule Facebook, not by consensus, but by himself. When Zuckerberg was forced to make an IPO, he did everything in his power to minimize outside control. I also believe(not sure about this), that Zuckerberg still retains majority control of the company.
Re: In Facebook Deal, Board Was All But Out of Picture
#8Well, this has been evident for a long time. Mark Zuckerberg intends to rule Facebook, not by consensus, but by himself. When Zuckerberg was forced to make an IPO, he did everything in his power to minimize outside control. I also believe(not sure about this), that Zuckerberg still retains majority control of the company.
[deleted]
Re: In Facebook Deal, Board Was All But Out of Picture
#9Well, this has been evident for a long time. Mark Zuckerberg intends to rule Facebook, not by consensus, but by himself. When Zuckerberg was forced to make an IPO, he did everything in his power to minimize outside control. I also believe(not sure about this), that Zuckerberg still retains majority control of the company.
Yep, he owns 28% of the stock but 57% of the voting rights, according to the article.