Trivy: The all-in-one open source security scanner
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Trivy: The all-in-one open source security scanner
#2Re: Trivy: The all-in-one open source security scanner
#3I would kill for an all-in-one solution where I work... today we use a different scanner for every single type of scan we perform, and it's a nightmare to programmatically analyze the results.
FWIW, here’s a link to supported scans. https://documentation.defectdojo.com/integrations/parsers/fi...
Re: Trivy: The all-in-one open source security scanner
#4Yet another quote open source project that is too controlled by a for profit company.
Re: Trivy: The all-in-one open source security scanner
#5I would kill for an all-in-one solution where I work... today we use a different scanner for every single type of scan we perform, and it's a nightmare to programmatically analyze the results.
I host https://www.defectdojo.org/ in my org and send all our scanner results to that, it’s worked very well. I believe Trivy scan results are supported natively too. The only part that took much work was developing a workflow to automatically scan images with Trivy and then send the results to DefectDojo. FWIW, here’s a link to supported scans. https://documentation.defectdojo.com/integrations/parsers/fi...
Re: Trivy: The all-in-one open source security scanner
#6I would kill for an all-in-one solution where I work... today we use a different scanner for every single type of scan we perform, and it's a nightmare to programmatically analyze the results.
The specialized apps do a better job, but take longer to parse, or is it just a PITA for no reason?
Re: Trivy: The all-in-one open source security scanner
#7Re: Trivy: The all-in-one open source security scanner
#8I would kill for an all-in-one solution where I work... today we use a different scanner for every single type of scan we perform, and it's a nightmare to programmatically analyze the results.
I'm asking. Isn't there a trade off here? The specialized apps do a better job, but take longer to parse, or is it just a PITA for no reason?
Even if we did have a unified standard, it'd be a nightmare to move our legacy stuff over, and then it would be anybody's guess how well the standard would hold up over time w/ new controls and compliance programs being added