Live data from Hacker News

WhatsApp's AI shows gun-wielding children when prompted with 'Palestine'

theguardian.com

1–7 of 7 posts

Re: WhatsApp's AI shows gun-wielding children when prompted with 'Palestine'

#3

[flagged]

Or perhaps it's based on the false premise that all arabs/muslims are terrorists. AI systems have a bias towards the modes with the most data and unfortunately for arabs and muslims they're badly represented in the media.

Re: WhatsApp's AI shows gun-wielding children when prompted with 'Palestine'

#4
post #3

[flagged]

Or perhaps it's based on the false premise that all arabs/muslims are terrorists. AI systems have a bias towards the modes with the most data and unfortunately for arabs and muslims they're badly represented in the media.

Anybody said something about arabs/muslims? Typical

Re: WhatsApp's AI shows gun-wielding children when prompted with 'Palestine'

#5
post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or perhaps it's based on the false premise that all arabs/muslims are terrorists. AI systems have a bias towards the modes with the most data and unfortunately for arabs and muslims they're badly represented in the media.

Anybody said something about arabs/muslims? Typical

Well, you said and I quote "maybe it's based in some kind of Fact" so I assumed that you were implying that there is in fact a connection between Palestinian children and weapons and since the majority of Palestinians are arabs/muslims I deduced that that's where the fact you mentioned is coming from. You didn't state clearly what you meant by "fact" so I filled the gap. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

Re: WhatsApp's AI shows gun-wielding children when prompted with 'Palestine'

#7
post #5

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Anybody said something about arabs/muslims? Typical

Well, you said and I quote "maybe it's based in some kind of Fact" so I assumed that you were implying that there is in fact a connection between Palestinian children and weapons and since the majority of Palestinians are arabs/muslims I deduced that that's where the fact you mentioned is coming from. You didn't state clearly what you meant by "fact" so I filled the gap. Please correct me if I'm wrong.

What is that tone about? It seems to me that I observe a certain bellicosity in your comment.