Physics has long failed to explain life–testing a groundbreaking new theory
theconversation.com
Physics has long failed to explain life–testing a groundbreaking new theory
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: Physics has long failed to explain life–testing a groundbreaking new theory
#2Re: Physics has long failed to explain life–testing a groundbreaking new theory
#3I'll take a stab at it: Water wets things whose surfaces are tuned (across a spectrum) to vibrate with water. Life arises when enough star-stuff is arranged in a way that self-propagates (and more, beyond what viruses do). This requires the relevant parts be resonant enough; not too hot or cold, proper pH, not too much radiation, etc.
Is this just a tautology?
While the question the article brings up is interesting, I don't think I'll be surprised by the answer, and I doubt it'll change anything about existence, except maybe we'll be able to animate a lump of elements like Dr. Frankenstein did in Mary Shelley's famous novel?
Re: Physics has long failed to explain life–testing a groundbreaking new theory
#4Those baffled by "life-testing" (poke it to see if it moves?) should try mentally adding some spacing around the em-dash: Physics has long failed to explain life – testing a groundbreaking new theory
Re: Physics has long failed to explain life–testing a groundbreaking new theory
#5Those baffled by "life-testing" (poke it to see if it moves?) should try mentally adding some spacing around the em-dash: Physics has long failed to explain life – testing a groundbreaking new theory
My mistake as I rushed to cut the title down to fit. Probably doesn't help that I'm sick...