Unity: We Have Heard You
twitter.com
Unity: We Have Heard You
1–10 of 105 posts
Re: Unity: We Have Heard You
#2> We apologize for the confusion
Ah, I guess it was just a big misunderstanding!
Re: Unity: We Have Heard You
#3If only there was some way to talk to their customers ahead of time. Corporate infantilism at its finest.
Re: Unity: We Have Heard You
#4How about you fire the CEO that allowed such a boneheaded decision? With them in charge, how could one ever trust your company to not make such moves again?
Re: Unity: We Have Heard You
#5> We apologize for the confusion Ah, I guess it was just a big misunderstanding!
There was certainly a confusion of ideas in the process of reaching the original decision; maybe that's what they're talking about...
Re: Unity: We Have Heard You
#6Changing the policy is not a complete u-turn on the policy. The trust is gone.
Re: Unity: We Have Heard You
#7Re: Unity: We Have Heard You
#8How about you fire the CEO that allowed such a boneheaded decision? With them in charge, how could one ever trust your company to not make such moves again?
Even Apple did similar with their proposed CSAM scanning, and after the uproar, walked that decision back. So at least Unity is at least giving a head nod towards decency. It could definitely be worse. Imagine if Musk was in charge.
Re: Unity: We Have Heard You
#9"Don't get us wrong: We're not changing a thing. But we heard you!"
Re: Unity: We Have Heard You
#10> We apologize for the confusion Ah, I guess it was just a big misunderstanding!
That's always my favorite response. If only you understood what we were saying, you'd support our great (for us) idea!
Uh, no. I understood you perfectly. I still oppose it.