Live data from Hacker News

Therac-25

en.wikipedia.org

1–10 of 16 posts

Re: Therac-25

#6
So they took components from a previous system, didn't test properly on the new system and today we inherit a whole lot of regulation for medical equipment because of this. Not that it's a bad thing that we ensure proper testing has occurred but there are so many cases where legally this applies even if it's very peripheral (like say a UI change in a menu item of something not related to medical equipment but is never the less under compliance)

Re: Therac-25

#7
post #6

So they took components from a previous system, didn't test properly on the new system and today we inherit a whole lot of regulation for medical equipment because of this. Not that it's a bad thing that we ensure proper testing has occurred but there are so many cases where legally this applies even if it's very peripheral (like say a UI change in a menu item of something not related to medical equipment but is neve…

>So they took components from a previous system, didn't test properly on the new system

That is also how the first Ariane 5 crashed.

Re: Therac-25

#9

The Causality episode on this is really good: https://engineered.network/causality/episode-39-therac-25/

The always-excellent Plainly Difficult ran an episode [0] on this topic a few years ago. [0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-7gVqBY52MY

Kyle Hill also made a video on the topic. Different video styles if Plainly Difficult isn't your jam.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ap0orGCiou8

Post reply on HN