Live data from Hacker News

Why we chose Mongo + Hypertable

brownbag.springmetrics.com

1–7 of 7 posts

Re: Why we chose Mongo + Hypertable

#5
post #3

"Map/reduce operations aren’t exactly blazing fast, and are single-threaded (though they will parallelize over shards)." This sounds extremely pointless with it being single-threaded, but whatever.

Its single-threaded nature for map/reduce is its biggest liability in my opintion. It will apparently be fixed in the next version (https://jira.mongodb.org/browse/SERVER-4258)

Right now, large map/reduce operations just bring the thing to its knees. So we just don't map/reduce with it. The query features are really quite nice, and we do the rest in hypertable.

Re: Why we chose Mongo + Hypertable

#6

What do they use for hosting? As Jay Kreps (works at LinkedIn, created Voldemort DB) would wonder, they went from a service managed by Amazon to what? http://blog.empathybox.com/post/19574936361/getting-real-abo...

We're still on EC2, though we've learned to distribute servers across availability zones.