X “unfit” for banking because of complicity in Saudi spying, lawyers argue
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: X “unfit” for banking because of complicity in Saudi spying, lawyers argue
#2On top of that, Xitter is using an Israeli intelligence firm for user verification. No way should Xitter become a bank with so many leaks to foreign intelligence services.
[0] https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/x-twitter-israel-concerns...
Re: X “unfit” for banking because of complicity in Saudi spying, lawyers argue
#3Re: X “unfit” for banking because of complicity in Saudi spying, lawyers argue
#4Even without the Saudi connection, Twitter doesn't exactly sound like a great basis for a bank to me.
Re: X “unfit” for banking because of complicity in Saudi spying, lawyers argue
#5The current banking licenses don’t prevent impropriety, dont prevent illegal activities.
Merely disliking some geopolitical thing shouldn’t be a factor in having a banking or money transmitter license.
A bank with a custodial solution and hedge more comprehensive than “go long on US treasuries” is good enough
Re: X “unfit” for banking because of complicity in Saudi spying, lawyers argue
#6Even without the Saudi connection, Twitter doesn't exactly sound like a great basis for a bank to me.
I've not much confidence that a company known for not getting permits and not paying rent or severance will carry through and pay out my own money when I want them to.