Apple vs. Meta: The Illusion of Privacy
growth.design
Apple vs. Meta: The Illusion of Privacy
1–10 of 359 posts
Re: Apple vs. Meta: The Illusion of Privacy
#2[deleted]
Re: Apple vs. Meta: The Illusion of Privacy
#3Apple does enough for privacy, but Meta is the real a*hole here
Re: Apple vs. Meta: The Illusion of Privacy
#4Fuck me that’s the worst UX I’ve seen in ages
Re: Apple vs. Meta: The Illusion of Privacy
#5There's no "ransom" being held for deleting your data from Threads. The point is that Threads is built on top of Instagram, which means that if you want to delete your data, Threads doesn't have it. Instagram does.
Re: Apple vs. Meta: The Illusion of Privacy
#6Apple does enough for privacy, but Meta is the real a*hole here
Enough for some, clearly not all, hence this ... visual tour
Re: Apple vs. Meta: The Illusion of Privacy
#7That's a pretty neat way of making a "blog post". Reveal.js I guess?
Re: Apple vs. Meta: The Illusion of Privacy
#8Fuck me that’s the worst UX I’ve seen in ages
Threads or the site?
Re: Apple vs. Meta: The Illusion of Privacy
#9There's no "ransom" being held for deleting your data from Threads. The point is that Threads is built on top of Instagram, which means that if you want to delete your data, Threads doesn't have it. Instagram does.
That's just tech-speak. To the end user these are two separate apps. And Meta definitely has a way of telling which bits of data came from Threads and which from Instragram. They just chose not to make it easy for the user to delete only Threads data.
Re: Apple vs. Meta: The Illusion of Privacy
#10Threads isn't banned in the EU.
The rumour is that Threads couldn't launch in the EU due to upcoming Digital Markets App. Which is also a good thing: https://ia.net/topics/unraveling-the-digital-markets-act