Hacking GTA V RP Servers Using Web Exploitation Techniques
1–10 of 40 posts
Re: Hacking GTA V RP Servers Using Web Exploitation Techniques
#2Re: Hacking GTA V RP Servers Using Web Exploitation Techniques
#3I know XSS is dying due to CORS and DLL injection is mooted by ALSR, that API's are usually authenticated and authorized, but damn...
I wish there was a more collective place to showcase modern exploits, they just hit nice in the feelies.
Re: Hacking GTA V RP Servers Using Web Exploitation Techniques
#4I miss these kinda posts, so rare now. I know XSS is dying due to CORS and DLL injection is mooted by ALSR, that API's are usually authenticated and authorized, but damn... I wish there was a more collective place to showcase modern exploits, they just hit nice in the feelies.
Re: Hacking GTA V RP Servers Using Web Exploitation Techniques
#5I don't agree with the conclusion that it's because it's peer-to-peer. that's not why -- it's because of lazy developer methods and a lower prioritization of security effort.
the biggest genuine effort that Rockstar puts into anti-cheat effort is an occassional memory-structure shuffle to kick sand into cheat-engine users eyes, and the occassional honey-pot that bans a few hundred people -- and these efforts come after begging Rockstar for years to do something, and the most it accomplishes is selling additional copies of the already dirt-cheap game.
These ban cycles and 'enforced ignorance' to the problem nets them more profit than it would otherwise; disenchanted players play less, reducing infrastructure costs -- and banned players buy another 2 dollar copy of the game -- but it kills user experience outside of single player entirely.
They don't care. I get it, but it sucks -- and it's not some GTA6 thing, they never cared.
Re: Hacking GTA V RP Servers Using Web Exploitation Techniques
#6it's nice seeing someone open with telling everyone that GTA V is some of the most poisoned online gameplay with regards to cheating. I don't agree with the conclusion that it's because it's peer-to-peer. that's not why -- it's because of lazy developer methods and a lower prioritization of security effort. the biggest genuine effort that Rockstar puts into anti-cheat effort is an occassional memory-structure shuffle…
Re: Hacking GTA V RP Servers Using Web Exploitation Techniques
#7it's nice seeing someone open with telling everyone that GTA V is some of the most poisoned online gameplay with regards to cheating. I don't agree with the conclusion that it's because it's peer-to-peer. that's not why -- it's because of lazy developer methods and a lower prioritization of security effort. the biggest genuine effort that Rockstar puts into anti-cheat effort is an occassional memory-structure shuffle…
Re: Hacking GTA V RP Servers Using Web Exploitation Techniques
#8it's nice seeing someone open with telling everyone that GTA V is some of the most poisoned online gameplay with regards to cheating. I don't agree with the conclusion that it's because it's peer-to-peer. that's not why -- it's because of lazy developer methods and a lower prioritization of security effort. the biggest genuine effort that Rockstar puts into anti-cheat effort is an occassional memory-structure shuffle…
Re: Hacking GTA V RP Servers Using Web Exploitation Techniques
#9I miss these kinda posts, so rare now. I know XSS is dying due to CORS and DLL injection is mooted by ALSR, that API's are usually authenticated and authorized, but damn... I wish there was a more collective place to showcase modern exploits, they just hit nice in the feelies.
Re: Hacking GTA V RP Servers Using Web Exploitation Techniques
#10I miss these kinda posts, so rare now. I know XSS is dying due to CORS and DLL injection is mooted by ALSR, that API's are usually authenticated and authorized, but damn... I wish there was a more collective place to showcase modern exploits, they just hit nice in the feelies.
ASLR doesn't stop DLL injection.
I see why; in return to libc, which is prevented by ASLR, you are injecting the control of flow into the middle of a DLL(that DLL is libc). The terminology is a little confusing.