The Myth of Google's Plus
blog.zarfhome.com
The Myth of Google's Plus
1–4 of 4 posts
Re: The Myth of Google's Plus
#2No, not Google+ the failed social media service. I want to talk about the + operator that Google Search used to support.
Re: The Myth of Google's Plus
#3No, not Google+ the failed social media service. I want to talk about the + operator that Google Search used to support.
I was surprised how murky comparatively recent tech oral(ish) history can be. My memory of what did or didn't work in the search box and + was different to what I read.
And, my memory not withstanding it appears that intent and meaning of + in search changed over time.
Re: The Myth of Google's Plus
#4No, not Google+ the failed social media service. I want to talk about the + operator that Google Search used to support.
I was surprised how murky comparatively recent tech oral(ish) history can be. My memory of what did or didn't work in the search box and + was different to what I read. And, my memory not withstanding it appears that intent and meaning of + in search changed over time.
I think the murkiness of this recent history is more a matter of misunderstanding at the time than people misremembering after the fact.
I remember believing it prevented optionality for more than common words. I can't recall exactly when I believed this or if I ever knew it had changed to a verbatim meaning, but quotes always seemed the more natural symbol for the latter. I'm sure my belief in the obligatory-but-not-verbatim meaning of '+' was supported by its apparent contrast to '-', which excluded search results with that term, since it makes sense that the opposing symbols would have opposing meanings.