Live data from Hacker News

Publish Everything (Pretty Much)

tidyfirst.substack.com

1–10 of 28 posts

Re: Publish Everything (Pretty Much)

#2
Do we need to spell out why something is interesting or useful? Show don't tell?

Or are we all looking for an aesthetic that we love and want to see more of but we know it when we see it?

I've been journalling about computers since 2013. I am looking for something higher and beautiful.

Re: Publish Everything (Pretty Much)

#3
Au contraire. Publish nothing, delete the key results, and put intentional bugs in every home project. Otherwise you will be stolen from, or exploited. Sit back and wait and watch the rare few people approach your ideas. Reach out to them with interest and make best friends for life.

I know the op isn't about this but love putting nuggets like this out there

Re: Publish Everything (Pretty Much)

#4
I too write a Substack and I have also experienced this. There have been articles that I’ve written that have out performed my expectations, articles that I was sure would do well and flopped, articles that didn’t do well when I initially posted, then suddenly receive a lot of traffic a few months later due to a share, etc.

Very rarely do I write an article, know it will go viral, and then have it do well. It’s still hard when I have a string of bad weeks where nothing does well, because I still want to grow my audience and viewership. I have to remind myself that I started writing because I just desperately wanted to see a certain type of content put out into this world. This means that there are lots of times I write about things I know won’t do well ( a history about BSD, a tutorial about using xml with C#). As my readership grows it can be hard to write those types of articles, but I’m trying to stay true to myself.

Most of the time writing is fun, but there are definitely weeks were it’s hard to feel inspired. But for some reason for me writing just feels like breathing. It’s something I have to do, even if I don’t always enjoy it.

Re: Publish Everything (Pretty Much)

#5

Do we need to spell out why something is interesting or useful? Show don't tell? Or are we all looking for an aesthetic that we love and want to see more of but we know it when we see it? I've been journalling about computers since 2013. I am looking for something higher and beautiful.

I think either works and I read with different purposes I mind.

Get your work out there and see.

Re: Publish Everything (Pretty Much)

#7

Au contraire. Publish nothing, delete the key results, and put intentional bugs in every home project. Otherwise you will be stolen from, or exploited. Sit back and wait and watch the rare few people approach your ideas. Reach out to them with interest and make best friends for life. I know the op isn't about this but love putting nuggets like this out there

comes down to what your goal really is.

you are either being sarcastic, or just super cynical.

in any case, I don't have enough fucks to give out for fame, my intention is different from the person who wrote the article who clearly enjoys the attention; to each our own

nonetheless, the signal is clear (and I agree with it) the author of something is usually the worst judge of which of their work is 'best', and ultimately, the "best hits" will not be their own choice but the choice of them inspired by the authored piece.

--

closer to the middle: do be wary of publishing too much, as if there weren't already a deluge of content

Re: Publish Everything (Pretty Much)

#8
Took me a while to parse that headline. I was trying to figure out what "land-publishing" was.

I realise that most typographic style guides recommend not putting spaces around em-dashes which separate clauses in a sentence, but I always have trouble distinguishing between em-dashes and hyphens in most fonts. As a result, I often mistake non-spaced em-dashed clauses with hyphenated words, leading to confusion.

I note that the original article does not use the word "land" anywhere at all; not in the title, nor the body. The un-editorialised headline "Publish Everything (Pretty Much)" is (IMO) much clearer.

Re: Publish Everything (Pretty Much)

#9
post #8

Took me a while to parse that headline. I was trying to figure out what "land-publishing" was. I realise that most typographic style guides recommend not putting spaces around em-dashes which separate clauses in a sentence, but I always have trouble distinguishing between em-dashes and hyphens in most fonts. As a result, I often mistake non-spaced em-dashed clauses with hyphenated words, leading to confusion. I note…

Except that’s an en-dash, not an em-dash. So it’s still confusing even if you can distinguish the latter from a hyphen.

Though it’s only Android fonts that make hyphen the same length as the en-dash.

Re: Publish Everything (Pretty Much)

#10
post #8

Took me a while to parse that headline. I was trying to figure out what "land-publishing" was. I realise that most typographic style guides recommend not putting spaces around em-dashes which separate clauses in a sentence, but I always have trouble distinguishing between em-dashes and hyphens in most fonts. As a result, I often mistake non-spaced em-dashed clauses with hyphenated words, leading to confusion. I note…

Except that’s an en-dash, not an em-dash. So it’s still confusing even if you can distinguish the latter from a hyphen. Though it’s only Android fonts that make hyphen the same length as the en-dash.

[deleted]
Post reply on HN