Absence of superconductivity in LK-99 at ambient conditions
1–10 of 81 posts
Re: Absence of superconductivity in LK-99 at ambient conditions
#2This one which finds substantial ferromagnetism and minimal diamagnetism is a far better reason to doubt that LK-99 is a superconductor:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.03110
Still very inconclusive because the synthesis is difficult and messy and nobody knows precisely what materials they're analyzing, but I've adjusted from cautious optimism to mostly resigned pessimism.
Re: Absence of superconductivity in LK-99 at ambient conditions
#3Re: Absence of superconductivity in LK-99 at ambient conditions
#4Now I don’t know what to believe.
Re: Absence of superconductivity in LK-99 at ambient conditions
#5Re: Absence of superconductivity in LK-99 at ambient conditions
#6This isn't a particularly meaningful paper because they failed to produce any kind of partial levitation. This one which finds substantial ferromagnetism and minimal diamagnetism is a far better reason to doubt that LK-99 is a superconductor: https://arxiv.org/abs/2308.03110 Still very inconclusive because the synthesis is difficult and messy and nobody knows precisely what materials they're analyzing, but I've adjus…
Re: Absence of superconductivity in LK-99 at ambient conditions
#7Re: Absence of superconductivity in LK-99 at ambient conditions
#8Now I don’t know what to believe.
So at this point no one should be believing anything until we have a lot more evidence.
Re: Absence of superconductivity in LK-99 at ambient conditions
#9Now I don’t know what to believe.
Re: Absence of superconductivity in LK-99 at ambient conditions
#10very detailed analysis of LK-99 https://twitter.com/TDebant/status/1688675638146727936