Replacing the bad flyback transformer in Apple's Studio Display 17"
1–10 of 64 posts
Re: Replacing the bad flyback transformer in Apple's Studio Display 17"
#2This explains my methodology for a lot of things in life
Re: Replacing the bad flyback transformer in Apple's Studio Display 17"
#3As the author says CRTs are dangerous. Even when they're off they can still carry insanely high voltages. The flyback transformer is one of the more dangerous components of them.
I'm great at electronics repair and I tend to avoid them. Luckily these days that's easy :)
If you don't know what you're doing, you shouldn't attempt it. Just get a more technical friend to do it.
If you do know what you're doing you probably wouldn't need this guide in the first place :)
Re: Replacing the bad flyback transformer in Apple's Studio Display 17"
#4Re: Replacing the bad flyback transformer in Apple's Studio Display 17"
#5I think Apple should have recalled these.
Re: Replacing the bad flyback transformer in Apple's Studio Display 17"
#6Re: Replacing the bad flyback transformer in Apple's Studio Display 17"
#7Nice job and write-up. As the author says CRTs are dangerous. Even when they're off they can still carry insanely high voltages. The flyback transformer is one of the more dangerous components of them. I'm great at electronics repair and I tend to avoid them. Luckily these days that's easy :) If you don't know what you're doing, you shouldn't attempt it. Just get a more technical friend to do it. If you do know what…
Re: Replacing the bad flyback transformer in Apple's Studio Display 17"
#8The sad reality of externality-removed capitalism is why would you do that? In our disposable economy, a new monitor can be had for cheap . Repairing things is for the poor or nerdy. which I resemble the latter pay. Incentivizing fixing things, rather than buying a new shiny flashy thing is not a thing that we do well. Oh well. Hopefully room temperature superconductors and solar and batteries can lead is to a place…
The replacement parts have a footprint, and a newer monitor might use so much less power in operation that it’s more efficient to make and use it than to continue to use the older CRT.
I really wish there were an easy way to work out if this was where the ‘efficiency crossover happens in X years of use’ point was. For example, I have a perfectly usable Thunderbolt 1 [edit: Thunderbolt 1 dock] that meets my needs. But it uses 5-10W of power more than a new Thunderbolt 3 or 4 one would. Should I continue to use it or switch to a newer one?
Re: Replacing the bad flyback transformer in Apple's Studio Display 17"
#9The sad reality of externality-removed capitalism is why would you do that? In our disposable economy, a new monitor can be had for cheap . Repairing things is for the poor or nerdy. which I resemble the latter pay. Incentivizing fixing things, rather than buying a new shiny flashy thing is not a thing that we do well. Oh well. Hopefully room temperature superconductors and solar and batteries can lead is to a place…
Many people don't have reason to prefer a CRT, and that's fine too. Lots of non-CRT options out there to use.
Re: Replacing the bad flyback transformer in Apple's Studio Display 17"
#10Thanks for sharing! I had a brand new one of these displays in 1999 when they first came out and it developed the same problem a year later. The replacement from MacMall’s warranty company (which was graphite instead of blue) also eventually developed the issue too. Good to know there’s a solution if I ever decide to fix it. I think Apple should have recalled these.