Hacker News Board Hacker News, browsed like a classic message board
Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: This Girl Next Door Does Not Exist (NSFW)

thisgirlnextdoordoesnotexist.net

Post reply on HN
Print view View original

1–10 of 27 posts

Show HN: This Girl Next Door Does Not Exist (NSFW)

#1

Post by perfect_layer »

Warning: NSFW.

I'm posting this from a throwaway. Note that on HN favorites are public, but upvotes are private.

Porn seems like it'll be one of the big areas of ai in the short term. There've been multiple threads and comments about AI + Onlyfans and AI + porn and AI girlfriends on HN recently (https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36888038, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36920987, https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36849066).

I've heard that porn is the industry that pushes new technology forward - VHS, bluray, highly scalable video serving.

I made a site compiling together some of the AI porn that I made with the help of some people on Discord over the past few months.

I don't think AI will get rid of onlyfans. People spend on onlyfans for more than just the images.

I do think people will have access to unlimited image and video porn at some point in the coming decade, which will definitely change the porn industry.

The site shows what's possible with AI porn today - images both sfw and nsfw, audio, text, and some moving images. There's even more possible than just what's on the page, with lots of people are playing around with making animated gifs that are nsfw, there'll be animated 3d nsfw avatars, and so on. So the site isn't comprehensive at all. But it's still quite interesting.

Show HN: This Girl Next Door Does Not Exist (NSFW)
thisgirlnextdoordoesnotexist.net

Re: Show HN: This Girl Next Door Does Not Exist (NSFW)

#3

Post by jrm4 »

Interesting.

I kind of feel like we haven't even fully gotten around to figuring out what it meant when we hit "all the porn (made by humans) is available all the time to anyone who wants it," which is universes away from when I was a lad coming of age at the time.

Like, can I attribute at least some of my interest in tech in figuring out how to program the VCR to record HBO at 2am (then sneak down to get the tape out before everyone wakes up?)

Sure!

Re: Show HN: This Girl Next Door Does Not Exist (NSFW)

#4

Post by carrolldunham »

I keep seeing AI people shoot themselves in the foot with the risible "animations" that are a static pic with the mouth morphing like a deliberately bad flash cartoon would do. After marvelling at still images that are indistinguishable from reality, how could seeing a 2000s morph of one called a moving image not be pure bathos? Why don't you stop? Know your limits!

Re: Show HN: This Girl Next Door Does Not Exist (NSFW)

#6

Post by perfect_layer »

noduerme wrote: post #2

Nothing below the waist? Do AI vaginas still look like Cthulhu?

AI vaginas look realistic now, people created LoRAs that can be used with stable diffusion to make realistic looking ones. No specific reason that I only included above the waist.

Re: Show HN: This Girl Next Door Does Not Exist (NSFW)

#7

Post by perfect_layer »

[deleted] wrote: post #5

[deleted]

Yes I've used that one and played around with a few similar tools. Quite impressive.

There was one on Show HN this week: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36864383

Pornpen was on Show HN a while back: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=32572770

Re: Show HN: This Girl Next Door Does Not Exist (NSFW)

#8

Post by [deleted] »

jrm4 wrote: post #3

Interesting. I kind of feel like we haven't even fully gotten around to figuring out what it meant when we hit "all the porn (made by humans) is available all the time to anyone who wants it," which is universes away from when I was a lad coming of age at the time. Like, can I attribute at least some of my interest in tech in figuring out how to program the VCR to record HBO at 2am (then sneak down to get the tape ou…

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: This Girl Next Door Does Not Exist (NSFW)

#9

Post by version_five »

Interesting how fingers are still wrong. In most cases zooming in you see there's some subtle or not so subtle problem. Look at the right hand of the second NSFW pic for example. I know the focus isn't the fingers so maybe it's easier to get away with flaws there.
Post reply on HN