Why haven't password complexity rules gone away yet?
lydiaoncybersecurity.com
Why haven't password complexity rules gone away yet?
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: Why haven't password complexity rules gone away yet?
#2Re: Why haven't password complexity rules gone away yet?
#3But my favorite: out of date thinking by decision makers. Since you have 2fa anyways, who cares? Is one sentiment. We will have passwordless, replace our auth provider or whatever silver bullet who cares is another.
Just updating the policy and doing the hard work of user education and improved UX doesn't have a good cost-benefit ration and it doesn't show managers spending a lot on vendors and drumming up costs of the alternative to show they're actually also saving money.
The list goes on. Passwords aren't sexy anymore so they don't ger invited to budget dates.
Re: Why haven't password complexity rules gone away yet?
#4Re: Why haven't password complexity rules gone away yet?
#5Re: Why haven't password complexity rules gone away yet?
#6- minimum of 21 characters
- has to contain capital letter
- numbers
- special character
I had a discussion with someone on the IT department on why this was unnecessary and he agreed but said they were forced by higher ups.
Re: Why haven't password complexity rules gone away yet?
#7My password manager sees these and suggests a compliant password
Re: Why haven't password complexity rules gone away yet?
#8My last job forced us to create a password with: - minimum of 21 characters - has to contain capital letter - numbers - special character I had a discussion with someone on the IT department on why this was unnecessary and he agreed but said they were forced by higher ups.
Management should never set password policies, but I’ll bet that in a large number of firms that’s the case.
Re: Why haven't password complexity rules gone away yet?
#9Because it took someone a long time to understand lookahead and other regex rules needed to get it setup on their system and they're both proud of it and loath to replace it!