Intent to approve PEP 703: making the GIL optional
discuss.python.org
Intent to approve PEP 703: making the GIL optional
1–10 of 513 posts
Re: Intent to approve PEP 703: making the GIL optional
#2Re: Intent to approve PEP 703: making the GIL optional
#3Re: Intent to approve PEP 703: making the GIL optional
#4Re: Intent to approve PEP 703: making the GIL optional
#5I'm looking forward to a GIL-less Python. I think the SC's pragmatic approach is the right one.
Re: Intent to approve PEP 703: making the GIL optional
#6[flagged]
Re: Intent to approve PEP 703: making the GIL optional
#7[flagged]
Re: Intent to approve PEP 703: making the GIL optional
#8Re: Intent to approve PEP 703: making the GIL optional
#9If I remember Guido van Rossum did mention the status of the GIL in one of the Lex Friedman episodes [1] he was on (it's been a while, so I may be misremembering). Surprised to see a big decision like this happen so quickly. Did Meta's announcement play a big role in this [2]? [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DVyjdw4t9I [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36643670
Re: Intent to approve PEP 703: making the GIL optional
#10If I remember Guido van Rossum did mention the status of the GIL in one of the Lex Friedman episodes [1] he was on (it's been a while, so I may be misremembering). Surprised to see a big decision like this happen so quickly. Did Meta's announcement play a big role in this [2]? [1]: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-DVyjdw4t9I [2]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36643670
Removing him as BDFL was probably the best thing to have happened to Python. He never prioritized performance as a top priority, at least not the same way Lua, JavaScript and Java did. Even Ruby has a JIT now.