Moving AI governance forward – openai.com
1–10 of 64 posts
Re: Moving AI governance forward – openai.com
#2>Scope: Where commitments mention particular models, they apply only to generative models that are overall more powerful than the current industry frontier (e.g. models that are overall more powerful than any currently released models, including GPT-4, Claude 2, PaLM 2, Titan and, in the case of image generation, DALL-E 2).
How is DALL-E 2 the "industry frontier" of image generation?
Re: Moving AI governance forward – openai.com
#3Related discussion over here: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36813194
Re: Moving AI governance forward – openai.com
#4Hard pass. No other company in any field had to do so much fear mongering about potential misuse of their tech all the way from original GPT releases & then go on a whirlwind world tour meeting political leaders to talk about their own product. Like startups & companies in each & every country can't get their leaders to talk with them let alone to journalists but somehow Altman is able to waltz right in to every location?
Re: Moving AI governance forward – openai.com
#5>Scope: Where commitments mention particular models, they apply only to generative models that are overall more powerful than the current industry frontier (e.g. models that are overall more powerful than any currently released models, including GPT-4, Claude 2, PaLM 2, Titan and, in the case of image generation, DALL-E 2). How is DALL-E 2 the "industry frontier" of image generation?
It was when it released.
It is very very weird OpenAI has done nothing with DALL-E 2, not even a price drop to compete.
Re: Moving AI governance forward – openai.com
#6What OpneAI is lobbying is actually a ban, better world wide, on products better then theirs. Just exactly the level they have, accidentally. It's not for profit or anything other all the humankind good, of course.
Re: Moving AI governance forward – openai.com
#7What OpneAI is lobbying is actually a ban, better world wide, on products better then theirs. Just exactly the level they have, accidentally. It's not for profit or anything other all the humankind good, of course.
I do not trust OpenAI or Altman to do the right thing here.
Is the ACLU or EFF doing anything in this space?
Re: Moving AI governance forward – openai.com
#8>Scope: Where commitments mention particular models, they apply only to generative models that are overall more powerful than the current industry frontier (e.g. models that are overall more powerful than any currently released models, including GPT-4, Claude 2, PaLM 2, Titan and, in the case of image generation, DALL-E 2). How is DALL-E 2 the "industry frontier" of image generation?
It was when it released. It is very very weird OpenAI has done nothing with DALL-E 2, not even a price drop to compete.
I'm sure they're working on DALL-E 3 but haven't published anything.
I'm even more sure a price drop wouldn't let them compete with the open models out there.
Re: Moving AI governance forward – openai.com
#9Hard pass. No other company in any field had to do so much fear mongering about potential misuse of their tech all the way from original GPT releases & then go on a whirlwind world tour meeting political leaders to talk about their own product. Like startups & companies in each & every country can't get their leaders to talk with them let alone to journalists but somehow Altman is able to waltz right in to every loca…
Considering how biased their own product is, I don't want them to have anything to do with "governance" of AI either.
Re: Moving AI governance forward – openai.com
#10If they so scared of AI, they could just stop building it.