Why ‘Dark Side of the Moon’ still matters at 50
washingtonpost.com
Why ‘Dark Side of the Moon’ still matters at 50
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Why ‘Dark Side of the Moon’ still matters at 50
#2Re: Why ‘Dark Side of the Moon’ still matters at 50
#3Re: Why ‘Dark Side of the Moon’ still matters at 50
#4Here I was thinking you meant the 2011 blockbuster, Transformers: Dark of the Moon, the third installment in the live action Transformers franchise by Michael Bay.
Re: Why ‘Dark Side of the Moon’ still matters at 50
#5And yet - Pink Floyd with Syd matters so much more: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36777995
Re: Why ‘Dark Side of the Moon’ still matters at 50
#6As a life long Floyd fan, I learned one of my favorite Pink Floyd facts from an HN comment a month or so ago:
> The instrumental section of Money is based on the live soundtrack they did for the moon landing in 1969.[1]
Absolute magic.
Re: Why ‘Dark Side of the Moon’ still matters at 50
#7I fucking love Pink Floyd and I love that album. I love how the entire album transitions into the next song beautifully. It's a masterpiece.
Also the album cover is great. I have a shirt based on it.