Show HN: A package manager for AI plugins
1–10 of 18 posts
Re: Show HN: A package manager for AI plugins
#2Re: Show HN: A package manager for AI plugins
#3Can you clarify what an "AI plugin" is?
Re: Show HN: A package manager for AI plugins
#4Re: Show HN: A package manager for AI plugins
#5This looks like it works with Chatgpt. Any plans to make it work with the rest of the LLM landscape? Langchain integration for example would be great for adoption.
You make a good point though. We should write a langchain plugin to our API.
Re: Show HN: A package manager for AI plugins
#6Can you clarify what an "AI plugin" is?
Looks to me that by AI they mean ChatGPT.
I'm really not sure...
EDIT - they are APIs with the neccesary metadata to be used as GPT plugins.
I was confused by the fact they aren't listed in GPT when you're in plugin mode - but that's just the officially vetted list.
(Before that I was confused by the interchangable use of "plugin" and "api" and the the use of "AI" when OP specifically seems to mean "ChatGPT"...)
Re: Show HN: A package manager for AI plugins
#7Cloudflare worker for building AI plugins. https://github.com/team-openpm/cloudflare-basics-ai-plugin
WorkGPT - framework for working with GPT functions. https://github.com/team-openpm/workgpt
Everything is open source.
Re: Show HN: A package manager for AI plugins
#8Considering what kind of data people are giving to AI, security is an important issue
Re: Show HN: A package manager for AI plugins
#9Re: Show HN: A package manager for AI plugins
#10Would appreciate openAI stops monopolizing the word AI, few years later they might get like Apple suing everyone with take down notices for everyone who’s using it.. also not impressed by anything open AI, as long as it’s isn’t open source and always under their mercy for pricing, restrictions, etc., I would rather use something else that’s community based.
* closed
* pay per usage api to make money and have ability to shut down users
* hide their research results
* quickly build up data
* quickly advance with Microsoft in bed
* lobby law makers to regulate it
* ...so entry barrier is higher for competition
* ...so they secure as much pie for themselves as possible
* exploit any other means to increase their dominant position and keep throwing rocks at others if possible
They're open-for-business, not open-source.
The best we can do is ignore them and support alternatives.