IKEA-Oriented Development
taylor.town
IKEA-Oriented Development
1–10 of 146 posts
Re: IKEA-Oriented Development
#2Re: IKEA-Oriented Development
#3Author here! Thanks for sharing :)
Most definitely bookmarking for later. This is good.
“Flimsiness is a feature” or something - I love this
Re: IKEA-Oriented Development
#4Author here! Thanks for sharing :)
Hey, I like this. More than I thought I would, as there are a lot of cheeky patterns, but this really summed up a lot of the things I value nicely. Most definitely bookmarking for later. This is good. “Flimsiness is a feature” or something - I love this
Haha
Re: IKEA-Oriented Development
#5Re: IKEA-Oriented Development
#6To extend this via analogy to the software realm, a deep refactoring is problematic whereas OTOH a complete rewrite is a better idea.
Which has not borne borne out by industry experience.
Re: IKEA-Oriented Development
#7Author here! Thanks for sharing :)
Re: IKEA-Oriented Development
#8Author here! Thanks for sharing :)
It is universal and approachable. Worldwide, IKEA has one set of documentation for assembly. It spans education, language, and cultural boundaries.
There is a huge value add in building software in a similar way in order to speak a certain way about that software. In some cases this may be untenable but in the vast majority of business cases I would venture that software and documentation inefficiency is born out of ignorance than necessity. I don’t mean that as a sleight, more that from a business perspective there’s generally a push for “new” and “more” instead of investments in refactoring and optimization.
The more that I am working with organizations looking for areas to improve in order to help them scale, the more the points in this article ring true for me. Thank you for writing it. It was a great read.
Re: IKEA-Oriented Development
#9Regarding the principles mentioned here, containers are the best overall method of delivering them. Containers package dependencies, the container definitely is the product, and they are composeable and disposable. Of course they do this by leveraging operating system primitives, so you don't have to use containers, but containers solve all these problems in one standard rather than having to use many other solutions.
Re: IKEA-Oriented Development
#10Another lesson of Ikea is that often you cannot move them from one home/apartment to another, because if you try to take it apart and then reassemble it, it's never the same. To extend this via analogy to the software realm, a deep refactoring is problematic whereas OTOH a complete rewrite is a better idea. Which has not borne borne out by industry experience.
As long as you are treating the stuff right it should survive a few assembly-disassembly-cycles. Key is of couese to sort the screws, mark the parts with tape, etc.