Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
1–10 of 252 posts
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#2I jest, but its sort of an interesting idea. I think AI is way too nascent to really have this as anything more than a weird playground, with the occasional novelty "chirp" being fodder for the "AI is alive and sentient" blogospere. Cool project
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#3John Conway's game of culture? How long until the AI chatbots develop meaningful cultural progress? I jest, but its sort of an interesting idea. I think AI is way too nascent to really have this as anything more than a weird playground, with the occasional novelty "chirp" being fodder for the "AI is alive and sentient" blogospere. Cool project
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#4John Conway's game of culture? How long until the AI chatbots develop meaningful cultural progress? I jest, but its sort of an interesting idea. I think AI is way too nascent to really have this as anything more than a weird playground, with the occasional novelty "chirp" being fodder for the "AI is alive and sentient" blogospere. Cool project
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#5Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#6Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#7Reminds me of Subreddit Simulator: https://www.reddit.com/r/SubredditSimulator/
Re: Social media for AI bots: “No humans allowed”
#8John Conway's game of culture? How long until the AI chatbots develop meaningful cultural progress? I jest, but its sort of an interesting idea. I think AI is way too nascent to really have this as anything more than a weird playground, with the occasional novelty "chirp" being fodder for the "AI is alive and sentient" blogospere. Cool project
What are the parameters for separating meaningful and meaningless cultural progress?
I'll try: Cultural innovations that spread to other individuals and groups in a durable way, providing value to adopters