But what if you're wrong?
world.hey.com
But what if you're wrong?
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: But what if you're wrong?
#2[dead]
Re: But what if you're wrong?
#3Yeah, but what if we're right?
This article is complete bullshit from beginning to end.
Re: But what if you're wrong?
#4[deleted]
Re: But what if you're wrong?
#5Although usually I found David's posts pretty interesting and well written, this post does not make a lot of sense.
"Later, that the vaccine would prevent you from getting the virus. Finally, that if you were vaccinated, you couldn't spread the virus. All of that, and plenty more, turned out to be false."
It's full of questionable claims (see above) and his reasoning is hard to follow, unless for anti-vaxxers maybe.
Re: But what if you're wrong?
#6Although usually I found David's posts pretty interesting and well written, this post does not make a lot of sense. "Later, that the vaccine would prevent you from getting the virus. Finally, that if you were vaccinated, you couldn't spread the virus. All of that, and plenty more, turned out to be false." It's full of questionable claims (see above) and his reasoning is hard to follow, unless for anti-vaxxers maybe.
Have you considered you might be wrong?
Re: But what if you're wrong?
#7Yeah, but what if we're right? This article is complete bullshit from beginning to end.
Right about what? We know for certain masks don’t stop the spread, the vaccine doesn’t prevent us from getting or spreading the virus. So you’re 100% wrong there. The only other claim is lab vs nature. US intelligence believes it was a lab, but we don’t know for sure and you certainly know less than them.
Re: But what if you're wrong?
#8Although usually I found David's posts pretty interesting and well written, this post does not make a lot of sense. "Later, that the vaccine would prevent you from getting the virus. Finally, that if you were vaccinated, you couldn't spread the virus. All of that, and plenty more, turned out to be false." It's full of questionable claims (see above) and his reasoning is hard to follow, unless for anti-vaxxers maybe.
Have you considered you might be wrong?
It's not as black and white as right or wrong. There is a lot more nuance to the choices made during the pandemic than the author leads us to believe.