Sundar Pichai received $226M compensation, boosted by a triennial stock grant
1–10 of 543 posts
Re: Sundar Pichai received $226M compensation, boosted by a triennial stock grant
#2Someone please call Ja Rule so he can make sense of this man’s salary…
Re: Sundar Pichai received $226M compensation, boosted by a triennial stock grant
#3The (editorialised) title [0] is classic Anchoring [1], me thinks.
Google did not fire folks because they were making losses. At some level, they got rid to appease Wall Street given their shrinking profit margins. I mean, here's a business that brings in revenues of £500M / day (over £150M / day net); an astonishing amount. Anchor against that? Never let the less spectacular get in the way of a click bait, I guess.
[0] The original title was something along the lines of, Sundar earned $226M while laying off thousands
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anchoring_(cognitive_bias)
Re: Sundar Pichai received $226M compensation, boosted by a triennial stock grant
#4[dead]
Re: Sundar Pichai received $226M compensation, boosted by a triennial stock grant
#5... And getting caught flat-footed against Microsoft (and Adobe, but but not as loudly) in the precise field Alphabet is supposedly the insurmountable leader.
Remind me again how big-co CEOs assume "all the risk"?
Re: Sundar Pichai received $226M compensation, boosted by a triennial stock grant
#6... And getting caught flat-footed against Microsoft (and Adobe, but but not as loudly) in the precise field Alphabet is supposedly the insurmountable leader. Remind me again how big-co CEOs assume "all the risk"?
> Remind me again how big-co CEOs assume "all the risk"?
Does anyone seriously believe this? I see it all the time as a "comeback" against CEOs, but I don't think I've ever seen anyone arguing that they actually are the ones that assume all the risk.
Re: Sundar Pichai received $226M compensation, boosted by a triennial stock grant
#7... And getting caught flat-footed against Microsoft (and Adobe, but but not as loudly) in the precise field Alphabet is supposedly the insurmountable leader. Remind me again how big-co CEOs assume "all the risk"?
>Remind me again how big-co CEOs assume "all the risk"?
That's a fairytale almost as preposterous as the tooth fairy.
Re: Sundar Pichai received $226M compensation, boosted by a triennial stock grant
#8Someone please call Ja Rule so he can make sense of this man’s salary…
This sounds like a comment on reddit
Re: Sundar Pichai received $226M compensation, boosted by a triennial stock grant
#9The (editorialised) title [0] is classic Anchoring [1], me thinks. Google did not fire folks because they were making losses. At some level, they got rid to appease Wall Street given their shrinking profit margins. I mean, here's a business that brings in revenues of £500M / day (over £150M / day net); an astonishing amount. Anchor against that? Never let the less spectacular get in the way of a click bait, I guess.…
Why doesn't Wall Street want to give rid of Sundar Pichai then as it's obvious he's dropping the ball and have been for the last years
Re: Sundar Pichai received $226M compensation, boosted by a triennial stock grant
#10[dead]