If we lose the Internet Archive, we’re screwed
sbstatesman.com
If we lose the Internet Archive, we’re screwed
1–10 of 614 posts
Re: If we lose the Internet Archive, we’re screwed
#2So, how do we create an Internet Archive Archive?
Re: If we lose the Internet Archive, we’re screwed
#3Re: If we lose the Internet Archive, we’re screwed
#4I know the government has viewed certain companies as "too big to fail," because of the negative financial impact we would experience if they were to do so.
I wonder if there needs to be a cultural equivalent, where a repository of digital or physical artifacts is "too big to fail" because of the negative cultural impact their failure would have.
In the absence of that, anyone who sees high cultural value to the preservation of these digital artifacts should, counterintuitively, not treat the Internet Archive as having some special status, but should treat it as a liability. It has become the custodian of too much, and too much is on the line if it fails.
Rather than trying to constantly shore up the IA so it can't fail financially, we should be looking at ways to preserve those artifacts redundantly, so that even if the IA fails, it's not a calamity.
Re: If we lose the Internet Archive, we’re screwed
#5This is pretty confusing... is the Internet Archive at risk from this legal decision?
Re: If we lose the Internet Archive, we’re screwed
#6I know the government has viewed certain companies as "too big to fail," because of the negative financial impact we would experience if they were to do so. I wonder if there needs to be a cultural equivalent, where a repository of digital or physical artifacts is "too big to fail" because of the negative cultural impact their failure would have. In the absence of that, anyone who sees high cultural value to the pres…
>> I wonder if there needs to be a cultural equivalent, where a repository of digital or physical artifacts is "too big to fail" because of the negative cultural impact their failure would have.
You can wonder all you like, and call me a cynic, but the US runs on money not culture. The American identity is built on money and wealth and excess, not on anything you might describe as "culture".
The IA would not "fail" if it was just left alone, but business never saw a nickel they didn't want to grab, so the law suits are not exactly surprising. And I expect the courts to lean towards the publishers.
Re: If we lose the Internet Archive, we’re screwed
#7The title implies that losing this lawsuit is threatening the existence of the Internet Archive. Is that really the case?
If it is true, then maybe IA should be run by somebody with better judgement. This was a project with a massive chance of failure (how could anyone think that this wasn't just blatantly infringing?) and a low payoff. If it's also an existential risk, then wtf are they doing running it?
Re: If we lose the Internet Archive, we’re screwed
#8ipfs?
Re: If we lose the Internet Archive, we’re screwed
#9The title implies that losing this lawsuit is threatening the existence of the Internet Archive. Is that really the case? If it is true, then maybe IA should be run by somebody with better judgement. This was a project with a massive chance of failure (how could anyone think that this wasn't just blatantly infringing?) and a low payoff. If it's also an existential risk, then wtf are they doing running it?
Yeah everyone pretty much said when they announced the National Emergency Library, they were risking everything. Sure enough, that's what happened.
Giving money to the current Internet Archive is pretty much just giving money to the book publishers. Instead we should be funding someone new to buy the assets off in the auction, and keep the previous decisionmakers far from the new entity.
Re: If we lose the Internet Archive, we’re screwed
#10The title implies that losing this lawsuit is threatening the existence of the Internet Archive. Is that really the case? If it is true, then maybe IA should be run by somebody with better judgement. This was a project with a massive chance of failure (how could anyone think that this wasn't just blatantly infringing?) and a low payoff. If it's also an existential risk, then wtf are they doing running it?
I use IA all the time and love the website and most of what they do. But some of the stuff that they do that risks getting it all shut down is why I stopped donating.