Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
1–10 of 43 posts
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#2interesting.
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#3[deleted]
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#4its actually different for www.google.com and google.com. Any googlers care to explain why?
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#5©2008 Google
Forgive my ignorance, but why don't companies program the copyright year to automatically update?
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#6its actually different for www.google.com and google.com. Any googlers care to explain why?
is it possible that google.com also includes subdomains like plus.google.com?
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#7The alternative, Google turning a blind eye to its own domain, would be far worse.
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#8©2008 Google Forgive my ignorance, but why don't companies program the copyright year to automatically update?
Because that would basically make the year meaningless.
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#9©2008 Google Forgive my ignorance, but why don't companies program the copyright year to automatically update?
The year is supposed to be the first year the work was created. You can do 2008-2012 if you want though (and let the end year automatically update). But since that's the assumption if you don't include the end year, there isn't any reason to do it.
Re: Google is reporting itself as a malware distributor.
#10©2008 Google Forgive my ignorance, but why don't companies program the copyright year to automatically update?
The year is supposed to be the first year the work was created. You can do 2008-2012 if you want though (and let the end year automatically update). But since that's the assumption if you don't include the end year, there isn't any reason to do it.
Facebook © 2012
The content of Facebook wasn't first created in 2012, so I'm not sure if you're correct. In fact, I've noticed that the majority of sites don't include a date-range. Regardless, thanks for the info.