SushiDAO served with subpoena by SEC
forum.sushi.com
SushiDAO served with subpoena by SEC
1–10 of 71 posts
Re: SushiDAO served with subpoena by SEC
#2[flagged]
Re: SushiDAO served with subpoena by SEC
#3[flagged]
what is r/FlordiaMan material?
Re: SushiDAO served with subpoena by SEC
#4...what even is SushiDAO? A Google search for "What is SushiDAO?" just gave a lot of articles with crypto-word-soup.
Re: SushiDAO served with subpoena by SEC
#5...what even is SushiDAO? A Google search for "What is SushiDAO?" just gave a lot of articles with crypto-word-soup.
maker of sushi-swap dex incorporated as a company perhaps a c-corp unnecessarily
SushiDAO created a legal entity “to reduce liability” and then that entity and an individual associated with it got subpoenaed.
PSA: if there’s an entity, it’s not a Decentralized Autonomous Organization
sushiswap: https://www.sushi.com/
$SUSHI coin: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/sushiswap/
SBF on sushi-swap: https://www.forbes.com/sites/tatianakoffman/2020/09/06/exclu...
SBF the white-knight saved sushi swap https://decrypt.co/41606/the-man-who-saved-sushiswap
Re: SushiDAO served with subpoena by SEC
#6Re: SushiDAO served with subpoena by SEC
#7Re: SushiDAO served with subpoena by SEC
#8...what even is SushiDAO? A Google search for "What is SushiDAO?" just gave a lot of articles with crypto-word-soup.
SushiSwap is an exchange where you can swap TokenA for TokenB. A DAO is where an Organization operates based on RFCs and community voting. SushiDAO is the combination of the two, so an exchange that is ran by community voting. I suspect if it’s a DAO operating as a subsidiary of an LLC it’s a method to avoid liability.
Re: SushiDAO served with subpoena by SEC
#9I initially thought this was a joke website about trading in literal sushi. After a few minutes on the website I'm still thinking it's a joke
Re: SushiDAO served with subpoena by SEC
#10>> Coverage: The Sushi DAO Legal Defense Fund will provide coverage for reasonable attorneys’ fees and costs for the following parties: Core contributors and multisig participants active since the ratification of Sushi 2.0 (Sushi 2.0: A Restructure For The Road Ahead 91) to present.
Anyone more familiar with the project able to speculate why they’re not including core contributors prior to Sushi 2.0?
___
Surprised core contributors would have publicly identified themselves, since even without any legal liability, to me it puts a huge target on their back given the leverage they have over the project assuming they have ability to commit code that is then distributed to the DAO.