The untapped potential of human programming (2022)
humanprogramming.substack.com
The untapped potential of human programming (2022)
1–10 of 37 posts
Re: The untapped potential of human programming (2022)
#2Re: The untapped potential of human programming (2022)
#3Human programming is easy until you reach the async, concurrent and parallel parts. Then you have to catch lots of exceptions and log the call stack. :)
Re: The untapped potential of human programming (2022)
#4The problem here is that this whole angle on human life seems to have forgotten that efficiency, productivity, etc are all there to help us find more time to live in a world where those things don't matter. To have leisure. To think unstructured, non-goal directed thoughts. You don't need "programming" to be human.
The other thing here is that this stuff is just what humans in all societies and organizations have been working on forever. We have collective and personal goals and we have all sorts of systems to reach them. We do research on how effective they are already. We do A/B testing. Not sure what calling this collective activity "human programming" accomplishes.
Re: The untapped potential of human programming (2022)
#5We have a water dispenser at work which can dispense regular, chilled, carbonated and cooking water. It has a printed out laminated instruction sheet next to it, because it all works with a combination of twisting a ring left or right, pushing it up or down, and I believe there is a handle too. That's bad design.
This is the reverse of "automate anything that can be automated", this is bringing the humans back in a step by step process.
Re: The untapped potential of human programming (2022)
#6 Educators, generals, dieticians,
psychologists, and parents program. Armies,
students, and some societies are programmed.
by Alan J Perlis, the first Turing Award recipient.Re: The untapped potential of human programming (2022)
#7How about design the coffee maker so I don't need a program to use it? We have a water dispenser at work which can dispense regular, chilled, carbonated and cooking water. It has a printed out laminated instruction sheet next to it, because it all works with a combination of twisting a ring left or right, pushing it up or down, and I believe there is a handle too. That's bad design. This is the reverse of "automate a…
The coffee machine is just an example, don't get hung up on it. If you think all possible coffee machines should be made so simple that they don't need instructions (1), then mentally replace it with a machine that you can accept will need instructions, like a 3D printer or a CNC lathe or whatever.
(1) a fallacy in itself because even if you are a genius who finds every well designed machine obvious to use, there are plenty of us who are not geniuses and require instructions even for the simplest of mechanisms.
Re: The untapped potential of human programming (2022)
#8How about design the coffee maker so I don't need a program to use it? We have a water dispenser at work which can dispense regular, chilled, carbonated and cooking water. It has a printed out laminated instruction sheet next to it, because it all works with a combination of twisting a ring left or right, pushing it up or down, and I believe there is a handle too. That's bad design. This is the reverse of "automate a…
Re: The untapped potential of human programming (2022)
#9Educators, generals, dieticians, psychologists, and parents program. Armies, students, and some societies are programmed. by Alan J Perlis, the first Turing Award recipient.
Re: The untapped potential of human programming (2022)
#10it's not untapped. it's just slightly more effective if I don't tell you I'm trying to program you.
in any case, in terms of "ultimate principles" all meaningful information is in the end an expression of some form of control;
more precisely, we can only observe (as a 3rd "objective" party) the results of meaningful exchanges between interacting entities by noticing (measuring) changing behaviors whenever "meaning" gets transferred from one to another entity; i.e. I'm pointing out that (similarly to electricity/magnetism) we can never observe "meaning" directly, but can measure its effects on beings interacting with the "fields of meaning" ahahhaha.