Google nixes paying out rest of medical leave for laid-off employees
1–10 of 155 posts
Re: Google nixes paying out rest of medical leave for laid-off employees
#2Re: Google nixes paying out rest of medical leave for laid-off employees
#3Why should Google pay maternity leave for laid off workers? They are no longer employees once they're laid off. At the very most they deserve a severence.
Optimistically, because it's the right thing to do.
Re: Google nixes paying out rest of medical leave for laid-off employees
#4Why should Google pay maternity leave for laid off workers? They are no longer employees once they're laid off. At the very most they deserve a severence.
Re: Google nixes paying out rest of medical leave for laid-off employees
#5Why should Google pay maternity leave for laid off workers? They are no longer employees once they're laid off. At the very most they deserve a severence.
Re: Google nixes paying out rest of medical leave for laid-off employees
#6Why should Google pay maternity leave for laid off workers? They are no longer employees once they're laid off. At the very most they deserve a severence.
Re: Google nixes paying out rest of medical leave for laid-off employees
#7Why should Google pay maternity leave for laid off workers? They are no longer employees once they're laid off. At the very most they deserve a severence.
Re: Google nixes paying out rest of medical leave for laid-off employees
#8Why should Google pay maternity leave for laid off workers? They are no longer employees once they're laid off. At the very most they deserve a severence.
The blame of the recent layoffs lay not with the employees but with the managers who had miscalculated their prospects in the midst of the covidic plague.
Re: Google nixes paying out rest of medical leave for laid-off employees
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
The blame of the recent layoffs lay not with the employees but with the managers who had miscalculated their prospects in the midst of the covidic plague.
Why is it the company's responsibility to keep employees that are no longer necessary? I don't understand that. Did Google or any other company promised these people that they will be hired forever? Google hired them and paid them very cushy salaries. What am I missing? I really don't understand the discussion around those recent layoffs.
Corporations like this don't deserve any loyalty. If I worked there and anybody offered to pay me even a few percent more, I'd leave in a heartbeat. I probably wouldn't even work hard, only the bare minimum to not get fired, because why should I? In conservative media this this is being spun as "nobody wants to work anymore because millennials and gen Z are lazy" but the real reason is very obvious for anybody under 30: as a corporate employee hard work doesn't pay off most of the time, instead you will be fired when shareholders are in danger of losing a few dollars.