Home food delivery’s questionable value, for consumers and investors
1–10 of 97 posts
Re: Home food delivery’s questionable value, for consumers and investors
#2Meal kits can be sold in stores. And groceries can be delivered.
I get the impression that just doing one of those might be a viable business, but it wouldn't be treated as a startup.
Re: Home food delivery’s questionable value, for consumers and investors
#3Meal kits ad delivery are actually two innovations that are only joined, it seems, because they make a technology startup (rather than just a business) Meal kits can be sold in stores. And groceries can be delivered. I get the impression that just doing one of those might be a viable business, but it wouldn't be treated as a startup.
Re: Home food delivery’s questionable value, for consumers and investors
#4Re: Home food delivery’s questionable value, for consumers and investors
#5Re: Home food delivery’s questionable value, for consumers and investors
#6To me, that seems like the logical evolution of meal kit services; zero marginal costs by outsourcing the logistics to companies that already do it at scale.
Re: Home food delivery’s questionable value, for consumers and investors
#7I love blue apron and I will miss it when their company fails. It sucks so bad to love a product you can’t save as a consumer.
Re: Home food delivery’s questionable value, for consumers and investors
#8Re: Home food delivery’s questionable value, for consumers and investors
#9Re: Home food delivery’s questionable value, for consumers and investors
#10There is an app in the UK called Lollipop, which works like Hello Fresh and the likes, except instead of delivering the ingredients to your house, it just adds the ingredients to the basket of your supermarket shop (and takes a commission). To me, that seems like the logical evolution of meal kit services; zero marginal costs by outsourcing the logistics to companies that already do it at scale. https://www.lollipopa…