1–10 of 42 posts
So would you guys rather wait a little longer for the prompt to answer or shell out the $42?
Personally, I might pay if they limit the number of responses per month, or they put up a credit system like Dall-E.
If not, one has to think about the use case, 42$ isn't so much but it's a plenty just for the funs.
I for myself would appreciate something like "Problem? 5$" If it's not solved, then 0.5 :)
Even it's a bit annoying, I do understand them trying to limit what the free, public facing model will answer but I'd say it'd be a pretty fair expectation to get more leeway for the Pro version.
This too shall pass. This is no different than the time when everyone was crazed about having an Alexa at home because "oh i am too busy to write down my grocery list"
I wish they would make the Pro version less filtered and less apologetic about only being a language model. Even it's a bit annoying, I do understand them trying to limit what the free, public facing model will answer but I'd say it'd be a pretty fair expectation to get more leeway for the Pro version.
It's possible to view almost every fact or opinion as somehow controversial, and I think they're misguided in trying to prevent things that may generate minor controversies.
In fact, it's interesting to see how a LLM might be biased after taking in massive amounts of training data.
I wish they would make the Pro version less filtered and less apologetic about only being a language model. Even it's a bit annoying, I do understand them trying to limit what the free, public facing model will answer but I'd say it'd be a pretty fair expectation to get more leeway for the Pro version.
If I was at OpenAI I’d be looking at this sort of ideology as what’s gonna be our downfall like it was with Dall-E 2 once a democratized model is released by someone else.