US Supreme Court releases leak investigation report

I found it interesting that a lot of the reasons the report gives for not being able to identify the leaker seems to boil down to pretty basic cyber hygiene.

"The investigators were not able to readily search and analyze all event logs because at the time the system lacked substantial logging and search functions."

Re: US Supreme Court releases leak investigation report

#8

Post by zeroonetwothree » Thu, Jan 19, 2023, 9:14 PM UTC

I'm not surprised, it seems like it was always a longshot to find out who it was.

Re: US Supreme Court releases leak investigation report

#9

Post by pcaharrier » Thu, Jan 19, 2023, 9:16 PM UTC

pcaharrier wrote: post #7

I found it interesting that a lot of the reasons the report gives for not being able to identify the leaker seems to boil down to pretty basic cyber hygiene. "The investigators were not able to readily search and analyze all event logs because at the time the system lacked substantial logging and search functions."

"There was no evidence discovered that anyone emailed the draft opinion to anyone else, although technical limitations in the Court’s computer recordkeeping at the time made it impossible to rule out this possibility entirely."

Re: US Supreme Court releases leak investigation report

#10

Post by gremlinsinc » Thu, Jan 19, 2023, 9:19 PM UTC

anigbrowl wrote: post #2

Spoiler: they didn't ID the leaker, and also didn't interview any of the justices.

We've done nothing, and we're all out of options, confused pikachu face. Though, personally I think this leak probably was good as it at least got public discourse going around the subject even though the justices ultimately went against public sentiment for reasons.

I'm personally WAY more concerned about Justice Thomas and Ginny Thomas and their links to the insurrection attempt, and other undermining of democracy.