Go 1.20
blog.carlmjohnson.net
Go 1.20
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: Go 1.20
#2[deleted]
Re: Go 1.20
#3> new slice to array conversions
I expect this to bite a few people in places they didn't know could hurt. Better grep your code for slice-to-array conversion.
Re: Go 1.20
#4> new slice to array conversions I expect this to bite a few people in places they didn't know could hurt. Better grep your code for slice-to-array conversion.
Note that afaik [3]string(s) was not valid before go1.20 so no existing code should use it. The semantic equivalent had to be written as *(*[3]string)(s) which also copies the array pointed to by *[3]string)(s). The new notation is basically a shorthand and easier to discover than using *(*[3]string)(s): https://github.com/golang/go/issues/46505
Re: Go 1.20
#5> new slice to array conversions I expect this to bite a few people in places they didn't know could hurt. Better grep your code for slice-to-array conversion.
Note that afaik [3]string(s) was not valid before go1.20 so no existing code should use it. The semantic equivalent had to be written as *(*[3]string)(s) which also copies the array pointed to by *[3]string)(s). The new notation is basically a shorthand and easier to discover than using *(*[3]string)(s): https://github.com/golang/go/issues/46505
Right. It was not a well-formed conversion. My bad.
Re: Go 1.20
#6Also particular note from the linked general release notes:
> Go 1.20 is the last release that will run on any release of Windows 7, 8, Server 2008 and Server 2012. Go 1.21 will require at least Windows 10 or Server 2016.
Windows 7 Extended Security Updates ending today expect to see that across a lot of software.
Re: Go 1.20
#7Title isn't great because this is just one part about the language changes, not standard library changes.
Re: Go 1.20
#8Is it just me or go looks like more and more brainfuck language after each new version?
Re: Go 1.20
#9Is it just me or go looks like more and more brainfuck language after each new version?
I feel the same... GoLang as a platform looks perfect, but syntax-wise it could be much simpler. I'm not sure why it is not, I think they try to differentiate from other languages, that's the only reason. Looks like C++ on steroids.