Live data from Hacker News

Self-hosted home network traffic monitoring with ntopng and a Fritz Box

davquar.it

1–10 of 28 posts

Re: Self-hosted home network traffic monitoring with ntopng and a Fritz Box

#7
post #6

[flagged]

It's a short spiral pattern, seems a little weird to attribute it to anything?

I wasn't aware there was a pedophile symbol so I searched it and found some 00s parenting advice "these are the symbols to be aware of", while also warning about AIM abbreviations that I'm pretty sure is just a made up panic, and some pizzagate articles, so I'm not sure that that's even a real thing.

Re: Self-hosted home network traffic monitoring with ntopng and a Fritz Box

#9
This is neat.

A word of caution, depending on how the network is laid out, this could cause severe bandwidth overhead if there isn't a dedicated, and unmonitored, interface for the capture to flow over.

One needs to be careful not to have the captured traffic flowing out to the monitor via an interface that's being monitored, otherwise load will snowball.

The example here omits eth1, so I'm presuming that's the path the capture takes, but it would have been nice to see the author call this out. Otherwise, without some sort of capture-side filter, which the fritzdump.sh script and example doesn't seem to include, the capture will include a copy of the monitoring stream and the bandwidth will snowball.

There's also the issue of the monitoring port likely not able to capture full bandwidth of the aggregate of the other ports being monitored. Since the buffer in the device likely isn't unlimited, there's a possibility for lost data during times of high traffic.

Re: Self-hosted home network traffic monitoring with ntopng and a Fritz Box

#10

Slightly off-topic: "an" should not be used with words beginning with H, unless the H is unvoiced, such as "an homage".

I just assumed that, because the server was providing resistance to the flow of packets on the network, it was properly called "an ohm server".
Post reply on HN