Riots Erupt After MIT Enforces Free Speech Mandate
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Riots Erupt After MIT Enforces Free Speech Mandate
#2No, nothing you can do can force me to respect what’s said. You’re always open to satire or ridicule or criticism or just being ignored. Peaceful demonstration is a right (it, too, is free speech).
There is no right to illegal speech although protest against its illegality might be appropriate. There’s no protection against libel or slander laws, nor the newer anti-discrimination statues. Speech might be “free” but it doesn’t lack consequences.
Re: Riots Erupt After MIT Enforces Free Speech Mandate
#3> must allow and respect the free expression of ideas, regardless of whether they agree with those ideas or not. No, nothing you can do can force me to respect what’s said. You’re always open to satire or ridicule or criticism or just being ignored. Peaceful demonstration is a right (it, too, is free speech). There is no right to illegal speech although protest against its illegality might be appropriate. There’s no…
Re: Riots Erupt After MIT Enforces Free Speech Mandate
#4Did the article quote the protestor wrong? Is "City Meme" a satire paper?
Re: Riots Erupt After MIT Enforces Free Speech Mandate
#5"We have the right to be oppressed and to oppress others. Free speech is just an excuse for those in power to silence marginalized voices." Did the article quote the protestor wrong? Is "City Meme" a satire paper?
Re: Riots Erupt After MIT Enforces Free Speech Mandate
#6> must allow and respect the free expression of ideas, regardless of whether they agree with those ideas or not. No, nothing you can do can force me to respect what’s said. You’re always open to satire or ridicule or criticism or just being ignored. Peaceful demonstration is a right (it, too, is free speech). There is no right to illegal speech although protest against its illegality might be appropriate. There’s no…
Also this is satire FYI
Re: Riots Erupt After MIT Enforces Free Speech Mandate
#7"We have the right to be oppressed and to oppress others. Free speech is just an excuse for those in power to silence marginalized voices." Did the article quote the protestor wrong? Is "City Meme" a satire paper?