Live data from Hacker News

The distinction between free speech as a legal right and cultural value

thefire.org

1–10 of 428 posts

Re: The distinction between free speech as a legal right and cultural value

#5
Freedom of association captures the idea of freedom of speech better than freedom of speech itself, I think. Private parties are (with some number of government constraints) free to pick who to work with, who to play with, and who to talk with, and who they don't want to do anything with.

Re: The distinction between free speech as a legal right and cultural value

#6
> The popular radio program “On the Media” feared Musk’s support for free speech would lead to a free-for-all environment rife with child pornography. But that’s a strawman: child pornography is illegal.

This is itself a strawman.

No one thinks Musk will permit it on Twitter. The gutting of the moderation teams who tackle it is the concern. An underenforced rule is often not a very effective one.

Re: The distinction between free speech as a legal right and cultural value

#8
post #6

> The popular radio program “On the Media” feared Musk’s support for free speech would lead to a free-for-all environment rife with child pornography. But that’s a strawman: child pornography is illegal. This is itself a strawman. No one thinks Musk will permit it on Twitter. The gutting of the moderation teams who tackle it is the concern. An underenforced rule is often not a very effective one.

No post body was provided.

Re: The distinction between free speech as a legal right and cultural value

#10
post #3

Quoted post unavailable.

I think it would be the “cultural value” piece

There's probably not much point explaining the cultural value of free speech to somebody who thinks free speech is so awful they can't even bring themselves to mention it without using a minced oath, as though they fear even the term itself.
Post reply on HN