The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigations [pdf]
1–10 of 12 posts
Re: The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigations [pdf]
#2Re: The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigations [pdf]
#3Re: The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigations [pdf]
#4Re: The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigations [pdf]
#5This is the main source of performance bottlenecks and also an obvious difference between natural and artificial neural networks. The brain does not even seem to have error signals, and we also can't seem to find any signal going in the opposite direction of propagation. It requires that you have an error signal ... and that means it requires knowing the right answer to the problem the algorithm is trying to solve. Also quite important to some companies: sending data in 2 directions through the network places serious limitations on parallelization of neural network training. It is one of the big causes that Google/Facebook/MS(OpenAI)/... only seem to have a 1y or less headstart over the rest of the industry, despite billions of investment.
Forward - forward tries to do online learning by training the network to differentiate between real and fake-but-really-realistic signals with data going in the same direction every time.
Re: The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigations [pdf]
#6Re: The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigations [pdf]
#7I've only skimmed it, but the gist seems to be that on MNIST the FF algorithm is within 30% as effective as the classic backpropagation. I didn't quite follow in my quick reading how the network can generate its own negative data, but this seems like what the future research would be interested in. Section 8 seemed to appear out of the blue, and talks about alternative hardware models for machine learning.
His argument is basically that this method is more amenable to analog implementation, and that eventually he believes that we will throw away the idea of separating hardware and software that's defined digital computation to date. Currently, we expect hardware will run the same software the same each time, but to make things more efficient he wants to "grow" the hardware and software together, to the point that you cannot have a piece of software that runs on a different device. The program has instead been learned to run specifically on that hardware and that hardware alone.
He also makes a point that this won't displace digital computers, and instead will be another class of computation hardware.
Re: The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigations [pdf]
#8What is being proposed appears to be Hebbian learning rule and the paper does not even mention that or the Hebb network, why? By the way, Hebbian learning rule was proposed in 1949 and is one of the pioneering work that demonstrated neuron-based models are worth investigation.
Re: The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigations [pdf]
#9What is being proposed appears to be Hebbian learning rule and the paper does not even mention that or the Hebb network, why? By the way, Hebbian learning rule was proposed in 1949 and is one of the pioneering work that demonstrated neuron-based models are worth investigation.
Is this really just Hebbian learning? That's often stated as "cells that fire together wire together", and I can see how that can line up with FF increasing the 'goodness' of actual data. But decreasing the 'goodness' of negative data seems like a qualitatively different mechanism.
"fire together" originally meant fire in same direction, but Hebb's rule was extended quite early to mean that if some cells inhibit some others too often, wiring in that direction will get stronger.
Re: The Forward-Forward Algorithm: Some Preliminary Investigations [pdf]
#10import numpy as np
# Define the activation function and its derivative def activation(x): return np.maximum(0, x)
def activation_derivative(x): return 1. * (x > 0)
# Define the goodness function (the sum of the squared activities in a layer) def goodness(x): return np.sum(x*2)
# Define the forward pass for the positive data def forward_pass_positive(X, W1, W2): # Forward pass a1 = activation(np.dot(X, W1)) a2 = activation(np.dot(a1, W2)) return a1, a2
# Define the forward pass for the negative data def forward_pass_negative(X, W1, W2): # Forward pass a1 = activation(np.dot(X, W1)) a2 = activation(np.dot(a1, W2)) return a1, a2
# Define the learning rate learning_rate = 0.01
# Define the threshold for the goodness theta = 0.1
# Define the number of epochs epochs = 100
# Generate the positive data X = np.array([[0, 0, 1], [0, 1, 1], [1, 0, 1], [1, 1, 1]])
# Generate the negative data Xn = np.array([[0, 0, 0], [0, 1, 0], [1, 0, 0], [1, 1, 0]])
# Initialize the weights W1 = 2np.random.random((3, 4)) - 1 W2 = 2np.random.random((4, 1)) - 1
# Perform the positive and negative passes for each epoch for j in range(epochs):
# Forward pass for the positive data
a1, a2 = forward_pass_positive(X, W1, W2)
# Forward pass for the negative data
a1n, a2n = forward_pass_negative(Xn, W1, W2)
# Calculate the goodness for the positive data
g1 = goodness(a1)
g2 = goodness(a2)
# Calculate the goodness for the negative data
g1n = goodness(a1n)
g2n = goodness(a2n)
# Calculate the probability that the input vector is positive data
p1 = 1/(1 + np.exp(-(g1 - theta)))
p2 = 1/(1 + np.exp(-(g2 - theta)))
# Calculate the probability that the input vector is negative data
p1n = 1/(1 + np.exp(-(g1n - theta)))
p2n = 1/(1 + np.exp(-(g2n - theta)))
# Calculate the error for the positive data
error2 = p2 - 1
error1 = p1 - 1
# Calculate the error for the negative data
error2n = p2n - 0
error1n = p1n - 0
# Calculate the delta for the positive data
delta2 = error2 * activation_derivative(a2)
delta1 = error1 * activation_derivative(a1)
# Calculate the delta for the negative data
delta2n = error2n * activation_derivative(a2n)
delta1n = error1n * activation_derivative(a1n)
# Calculate the change in the weights for the positive data
dW2 = learning_rate * a1.T.dot(delta2)
dW1 = learning_rate * X.T.dot(delta1)
# Calculate the change in the weights for the negative data
dW2n = learning_rate * a1n.T.dot(delta2n)
dW1n = learning_rate * Xn.T.dot(delta1n)
# Update the weights for the positive data
W2 += dW2
W1 += dW1
# Update the weights for the negative data
W2 += dW2n
W1 += dW1n
# Print the weights
print("W1 = ", W1)
print("W2 = ", W2)# Print the goodness for the positive data print("g1 = ", g1) print("g2 = ", g2)
# Print the goodness for the negative data print("g1n = ", g1n) print("g2n = ", g2n)
# Print the probability that the input vector is positive data print("p1 = ", p1) print("p2 = ", p2)
# Print the probability that the input vector is negative data print("p1n = ", p1n) print("p2n = ", p2n)