22-11-22 22:11:22

31337Logic wrote: post #3

coding123 wrote: post #2

I wonder if there was a single person in 1922 that had the same thought.

...or last year, on Nov. 12th.

or 11-11-11 11:11:11

or 01-01-01 10:10:10

Interview question: write a program to list them all!

Re: 22-11-22 22:11:22

#6

Post by hirundo » Tue, Nov 22, 2022, 9:33 PM UTC

2022-11-22 22:11:22.02

Re: 22-11-22 22:11:22

#7

Post by [deleted] » Tue, Nov 22, 2022, 9:35 PM UTC

31337Logic wrote: post #3

coding123 wrote: post #2

I wonder if there was a single person in 1922 that had the same thought.

...or last year, on Nov. 12th.

[deleted]

Re: 22-11-22 22:11:22

#8

Post by carl_dr » Tue, Nov 22, 2022, 9:36 PM UTC

quickthrower2 wrote: post #5

31337Logic wrote: post #3

Earlier quoted context omitted.

...or last year, on Nov. 12th.

or 11-11-11 11:11:11 or 01-01-01 10:10:10 Interview question: write a program to list them all!

Sounds like a great Code Golf contest.

ruby -e 'require"date";a=DateTime.new(0,1,1,0,0,0);(0..4e9).each{|d|b=(a+Rational(d,86400));c=b.strftime("%y%m%d%H%M%S");puts b.strftime("%y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S")if c==c.reverse}'

About the most inefficient anyone could make it, but I think it works!

Re: 22-11-22 22:11:22

#9

Post by orliesaurus » Tue, Nov 22, 2022, 9:38 PM UTC

happy 22-11-22 everyone, can't wait to wait for 23-11-23

Re: 22-11-22 22:11:22

#10

Post by bproctor » Tue, Nov 22, 2022, 9:40 PM UTC

I still regret missing Michael Scott's 05-05-05 party. It only happens once every billion years.