Sam Bankman-Fried Reaches Out to Elon Musk
twitter.com
Sam Bankman-Fried Reaches Out to Elon Musk
1–10 of 13 posts
Re: Sam Bankman-Fried Reaches Out to Elon Musk
#2Re: Sam Bankman-Fried Reaches Out to Elon Musk
#3This is great to see in a way, as it seems to show that Elon is interested in access to both sides of party lines. If a true area of focus it's probably good news for his businesses and their sustainability as we enter a stronger-gov, stronger-regs environment in the US.
Re: Sam Bankman-Fried Reaches Out to Elon Musk
#4Re: Sam Bankman-Fried Reaches Out to Elon Musk
#5This is great to see in a way, as it seems to show that Elon is interested in access to both sides of party lines. If a true area of focus it's probably good news for his businesses and their sustainability as we enter a stronger-gov, stronger-regs environment in the US.
Grifter "visionaries" with messiah complexes can indeed find common ground across "party lines".
Re: Sam Bankman-Fried Reaches Out to Elon Musk
#6IPFS + Blockchain + Starlink + Twitter = censorship-proof Web3.0.
I could be wrong.
Re: Sam Bankman-Fried Reaches Out to Elon Musk
#7This is great to see in a way, as it seems to show that Elon is interested in access to both sides of party lines. If a true area of focus it's probably good news for his businesses and their sustainability as we enter a stronger-gov, stronger-regs environment in the US.
Grifter "visionaries" with messiah complexes can indeed find common ground across "party lines".
Re: Sam Bankman-Fried Reaches Out to Elon Musk
#8Elon is wrong about blockchain Twitter. IPFS + Blockchain + Starlink + Twitter = censorship-proof Web3.0. I could be wrong.
Re: Sam Bankman-Fried Reaches Out to Elon Musk
#9Elon is wrong about blockchain Twitter. IPFS + Blockchain + Starlink + Twitter = censorship-proof Web3.0. I could be wrong.
Is access to money to pay for Twitter, Starlink and cryptocurrency not considered censorship of those unable to afford it?
Re: Sam Bankman-Fried Reaches Out to Elon Musk
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Is access to money to pay for Twitter, Starlink and cryptocurrency not considered censorship of those unable to afford it?
No. It's not. Why would you think it would be?