The $1.9B Powerball draw is still delayed
twitter.com
The $1.9B Powerball draw is still delayed
1–9 of 9 posts
Re: The $1.9B Powerball draw is still delayed
#2So there are 48 separate lottery agencies. I wonder if they found one of them committing fraud, similar delay happened in October.
Also $2B seems insane. At this point I think it would make sense to make it easier to win.
Re: The $1.9B Powerball draw is still delayed
#3So there are 48 separate lottery agencies. I wonder if they found one of them committing fraud, similar delay happened in October. Also $2B seems insane. At this point I think it would make sense to make it easier to win.
1 in 300 million, 1 in 100 million, both basically round down to zero chance. People playing it obviously aren't good at math, so I assume they get more benefit from the huge numbers because it gets more press.
Re: The $1.9B Powerball draw is still delayed
#4So there are 48 separate lottery agencies. I wonder if they found one of them committing fraud, similar delay happened in October. Also $2B seems insane. At this point I think it would make sense to make it easier to win.
1 in 300 million, 1 in 100 million, both basically round down to zero chance. People playing it obviously aren't good at math, so I assume they get more benefit from the huge numbers because it gets more press.
I have never played a lottery, I have no interest in lotteries, I don't seek out media that tends to discuss or advertise lotteries, etc, and somehow every time it crosses a billion I become aware of the rate of this thing ticking up just because other people are talking about it, and always it's been growing fast at an accelerating rate. If this is just the money going into the pot, 'the house' must be making a killing! Anyone know what the margin on this thing is?
Re: The $1.9B Powerball draw is still delayed
#5So there are 48 separate lottery agencies. I wonder if they found one of them committing fraud, similar delay happened in October. Also $2B seems insane. At this point I think it would make sense to make it easier to win.
1 in 300 million, 1 in 100 million, both basically round down to zero chance. People playing it obviously aren't good at math, so I assume they get more benefit from the huge numbers because it gets more press.
> People playing it obviously aren't good at math
Jackpot winning and odds is almost irrelevant, but is the only focus of most literature.
There are thousands of winners multiple times per week, and they do not split those smaller prizes. Several of which are over $1,000,000
regarding relative utility, I spend more on a cocktail
Re: The $1.9B Powerball draw is still delayed
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
1 in 300 million, 1 in 100 million, both basically round down to zero chance. People playing it obviously aren't good at math, so I assume they get more benefit from the huge numbers because it gets more press.
I have never played a lottery, I have no interest in lotteries, I don't seek out media that tends to discuss or advertise lotteries, etc, and somehow every time it crosses a billion I become aware of the rate of this thing ticking up just because other people are talking about it, and always it's been growing fast at an accelerating rate. If this is just the money going into the pot, 'the house' must be making a kill…
It's pretty public information, though you have to go to state lottery commissions for all the details: https://fortune.com/2016/01/13/where-the-money-from-the-1-5-...
Somewhere around half goes to prizes, another quarter to running the lottery, and the remaining bit is the proceeds for state funds. It's not especially effective as a source of fundraising, but it's a hack of a lot better than Vegas.
I have spent about a thousand dollars on lotto tickets through my life (including the rebate from my meagre winnings), and I've spent that amount on things that were a lot less entertaining per dollar. You're buying dreams and the flight of fancy, not any tangible benefits.
Re: The $1.9B Powerball draw is still delayed
#7So there are 48 separate lottery agencies. I wonder if they found one of them committing fraud, similar delay happened in October. Also $2B seems insane. At this point I think it would make sense to make it easier to win.
1 in 300 million, 1 in 100 million, both basically round down to zero chance. People playing it obviously aren't good at math, so I assume they get more benefit from the huge numbers because it gets more press.
If you could buy one of every number for $600M then even if you have to split the prize 2 ways the payout is greater than the cost when the pot is that big.
Mathematically though, your odds on a single ticket don't change, and realistically even a smaller jackpot is going to be life changing. So does it really matter?
I still bought a bunch of tickets. I'll just hope that I'm in a simulation and the real me is the one on the outside running it :) If I win, prepare for world peace.
Re: The $1.9B Powerball draw is still delayed
#8So there are 48 separate lottery agencies. I wonder if they found one of them committing fraud, similar delay happened in October. Also $2B seems insane. At this point I think it would make sense to make it easier to win.
1 in 300 million, 1 in 100 million, both basically round down to zero chance. People playing it obviously aren't good at math, so I assume they get more benefit from the huge numbers because it gets more press.
Rather than saying they aren't good at math a better way of putting it would be they are using a different objective function for their decisionmaking from you.
The marginal utility decrease from buying a ticket is close to zero for many/most people whereas the marginal utility increase from winning $2bn is essentially infinite. So the motivation for buying tickets is pretty clear in mathematical terms as long as you optimize expected marginal utility rather than expected value.
Re: The $1.9B Powerball draw is still delayed
#9Earlier quoted context omitted.
1 in 300 million, 1 in 100 million, both basically round down to zero chance. People playing it obviously aren't good at math, so I assume they get more benefit from the huge numbers because it gets more press.
Rather than saying they aren't good at math a better way of putting it would be they are using a different objective function for their decisionmaking from you. The marginal utility decrease from buying a ticket is close to zero for many/most people whereas the marginal utility increase from winning $2bn is essentially infinite. So the motivation for buying tickets is pretty clear in mathematical terms as long as you…
I think the marginal utility decrease is actually rather high for quite a lot of the people that play the lottery.