Live data from Hacker News

Monumental (if correct) advance in number theory posted to ArXiv by Yitang Zhang

news.ycombinator.com

1–10 of 439 posts

Monumental (if correct) advance in number theory posted to ArXiv by Yitang Zhang

#1
Yitang Zhang, the mathematician behind the 2013 breakthrough on bounded gaps in primes, posted to the arxiv today a result which (if correct) comes close to proving the nonexistence of Landau--Siegel zeros: https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02515.

To give a sense of the scale of this claim: If correct, Zhang's work is the most significant progress towards the Generalized Riemann Hypothesis in a century. Moreover, I think this result would not only be a more significant advance than Zhang's previous breakthrough, but also constitute a larger leap for number theory than Wiles' 1994 proof of Fermat's Last Theorem (which was, in my opinion, the greatest single achievement by an individual mathematician in the 20th century).

Some discussion / explanation of Siegel zeros and Zhang's claim can be found here:

https://old.reddit.com/r/math/comments/y93a86/eliundergradua...

https://mathoverflow.net/questions/433949/consequences-resul...

An account of Zhang's remarkable story (and his previous breakthrough) can be found here. Famously, prior to his breakthrough, he worked at Subway and lived in his car:

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/02/02/pursuit-beauty

Re: Monumental (if correct) advance in number theory posted to ArXiv by Yitang Zhang

#2
arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02515

Discussion https://old.reddit.com/r/math/comments/y93a86/eliundergradua...

https://mathoverflow.net/questions/433949/consequences-resul...

New Yorker article https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/02/02/pursuit-beauty

Re: Monumental (if correct) advance in number theory posted to ArXiv by Yitang Zhang

#3

arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02515 Discussion https://old.reddit.com/r/math/comments/y93a86/eliundergradua... https://mathoverflow.net/questions/433949/consequences-resul... New Yorker article https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/02/02/pursuit-beauty

[deleted]

Re: Monumental (if correct) advance in number theory posted to ArXiv by Yitang Zhang

#4

arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02515 Discussion https://old.reddit.com/r/math/comments/y93a86/eliundergradua... https://mathoverflow.net/questions/433949/consequences-resul... New Yorker article https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/02/02/pursuit-beauty

I didn't know how to make the links clickable. Thanks!

Re: Monumental (if correct) advance in number theory posted to ArXiv by Yitang Zhang

#5
Two additional notes:

1. Zhang posted an attempt at solving this problem in 2007 that he later more or less admitted was flawed: https://mathoverflow.net/questions/131221/yitang-zhangs-2007.... But speaking with mathematicians who are intimately familiar with Zhang's previous work, there seems to be good reason to be optimistic nevertheless. First, the idea behind Zhang's proof is similar to the zero-repulsion ideas appearing in known results about Siegel zeros, and is thus reasonable. Second, Zhang seems to have matured late, and unlike the flawed 2007 paper, his 2013 paper on bounded gaps in primes is meticulously written. He came a long way between those two papers, and he may have come even further since then.

2. Zhang is 67 years old. If the paper is correct, then Zhang constitutes a strong counterexample to G.H. Hardy's famous claims that "mathematics is a young man's game" and nobody alive today could say, as Hardy did, that "I do not know an instance of a major mathematical advance initiated by a man past fifty."

Re: Monumental (if correct) advance in number theory posted to ArXiv by Yitang Zhang

#6
Wow, from the 2015 article:

[A journal reviewer of his famous paper says]: "you should be careful. This guy posted a paper once, and it was wrong. He never published it, but he didn’t take it down, either.’ ” The reader meant a paper that Zhang posted on the Web site arxiv.org, where mathematicians often post results before submitting them to a journal, in order to have them seen quickly. Zhang posted a paper in 2007 that fell short of a proof. It concerned another famous problem, the Landau-Siegel zeros conjecture, and he left it up because he hopes to correct it.

Looks like he might have lived up to that!

Re: Monumental (if correct) advance in number theory posted to ArXiv by Yitang Zhang

#7

arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2211.02515 Discussion https://old.reddit.com/r/math/comments/y93a86/eliundergradua... https://mathoverflow.net/questions/433949/consequences-resul... New Yorker article https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2015/02/02/pursuit-beauty

I didn't know how to make the links clickable. Thanks!

We'll do that.

Re: Monumental (if correct) advance in number theory posted to ArXiv by Yitang Zhang

#8
post #6

Wow, from the 2015 article: [A journal reviewer of his famous paper says]: "you should be careful. This guy posted a paper once, and it was wrong. He never published it, but he didn’t take it down, either.’ ” The reader meant a paper that Zhang posted on the Web site arxiv.org, where mathematicians often post results before submitting them to a journal, in order to have them seen quickly. Zhang posted a paper in 2007…

If the proof is right, Zhang is in contention for greatest living mathematician with seven papers total, and on the basis of two of them (and should win all the major prizes he has not won yet and is still eligible for: Abel, Wolf, etc.). Would truly live up to Gauss' motto: "pauca, sed matura!"

Re: Monumental (if correct) advance in number theory posted to ArXiv by Yitang Zhang

#9
I'm not a mathematician, but the story of Yitang Zhang desperately makes me want this paper to be correct.

> Prior to getting back to academia, he worked for several years as an accountant and a delivery worker for a New York City restaurant. He also worked in a motel in Kentucky and in a Subway sandwich shop. A profile published in the Quanta Magazine reports that Zhang used to live in his car during the initial job-hunting days.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yitang_Zhang

Re: Monumental (if correct) advance in number theory posted to ArXiv by Yitang Zhang

#10
post #6

Wow, from the 2015 article: [A journal reviewer of his famous paper says]: "you should be careful. This guy posted a paper once, and it was wrong. He never published it, but he didn’t take it down, either.’ ” The reader meant a paper that Zhang posted on the Web site arxiv.org, where mathematicians often post results before submitting them to a journal, in order to have them seen quickly. Zhang posted a paper in 2007…

If the proof is right, Zhang is in contention for greatest living mathematician with seven papers total, and on the basis of two of them (and should win all the major prizes he has not won yet and is still eligible for: Abel, Wolf, etc.). Would truly live up to Gauss' motto: "pauca, sed matura!"

Even more incredible is that his own advisor refused to write him letters of recommendation upon graduation [1]

  After graduation, Zhang had trouble finding an academic position. In a 2013 interview with Nautilus magazine, Zhang said he did not get a job after graduation. "During that period it was difficult to find a job in academics. That was a job market problem. Also, my advisor [Tzuong-Tsieng Moh] did not write me letters of recommendation." ... Moh claimed that Zhang never came back to him requesting recommendation letters. In a detailed profile published in The New Yorker magazine in February 2015, Alec Wilkinson wrote Zhang "parted unhappily" with Moh, and that Zhang "left Purdue without Moh's support, and, having published no papers, was unable to find an academic job".

  In 2018, responding to reports of his treatment of Zhang, Moh posted an update on his website. Moh wrote that Zhang "failed miserably" in proving Jacobian conjecture, "never published any paper on algebraic geometry" after leaving Purdue, and "wasted 7 years of his [Zhang's] own life and my [Moh's] time".
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yitang_Zhang
Post reply on HN