Motto: Unsafe languages allow mostly-safe implementations
1–8 of 8 posts
Re: Motto: Unsafe languages allow mostly-safe implementations
#2Title change? The linked content is fine but the submitted title ("Motto: Unsafe languages allow mostly-safe implementations") doesn't appear anywhere in it.
Re: Motto: Unsafe languages allow mostly-safe implementations
#3Title change? The linked content is fine but the submitted title ("Motto: Unsafe languages allow mostly-safe implementations") doesn't appear anywhere in it.
Yes please. The submitted title is very opinionated (even if it states a derisory opinion that I agree with) and it hides the utility of TFA.
TFA's title is `libcrunch: run-time type- and bounds-checking for C (and maybe other languages...)`, which is plenty useful enough, and also useful enough for me to immediately form an opinion like submitter's.
Re: Motto: Unsafe languages allow mostly-safe implementations
#4Title change? The linked content is fine but the submitted title ("Motto: Unsafe languages allow mostly-safe implementations") doesn't appear anywhere in it.
Yes please. The submitted title is very opinionated (even if it states a derisory opinion that I agree with) and it hides the utility of TFA. TFA's title is `libcrunch: run-time type- and bounds-checking for C (and maybe other languages...)`, which is plenty useful enough, and also useful enough for me to immediately form an opinion like submitter's.
"libcrunch: run-time type- and bounds-checking for C" seems like a good title.
Re: Motto: Unsafe languages allow mostly-safe implementations
#5[deleted]
Re: Motto: Unsafe languages allow mostly-safe implementations
#6Title change? The linked content is fine but the submitted title ("Motto: Unsafe languages allow mostly-safe implementations") doesn't appear anywhere in it.
sorry about the misleading title choice; it’s quoted from the author’s homepage in reference to this work: https://www.humprog.org/~stephen/
also, could be marked [2017]
Re: Motto: Unsafe languages allow mostly-safe implementations
#7Title change? The linked content is fine but the submitted title ("Motto: Unsafe languages allow mostly-safe implementations") doesn't appear anywhere in it.
sorry about the misleading title choice; it’s quoted from the author’s homepage in reference to this work: https://www.humprog.org/~stephen/ also, could be marked [2017]
Thanks for the link!
Re: Motto: Unsafe languages allow mostly-safe implementations
#8Considering that "mostly-safe" is just an euphemism for "unsafe", the motto is quite funny if a but tautological.