Live data from Hacker News

Lex Fridman Interviews Richard Feynman

podcast.ai

1–10 of 59 posts

Re: Lex Fridman Interviews Richard Feynman

#4
post #2

this is fucked up manufacturing content from the voices/faces of prominent people that have died is no bueno fuck podcast.ai

You never get to close pandora's box.

The only choice you have is how to decide to adapt to the new reality.

Whining into the void about the new reality isn't adaptation.

It's weakness.

Re: Lex Fridman Interviews Richard Feynman

#5
Can you imagine seeing the first photograph of a person? Like all you'd ever known was paintings and then one day someone shows you a glossy, pixel-perfect photograph of yourself.

Photos didn't start perfect and neither is this black magic of recreating a person's speech patterns.

Hard to imagine a world without photographs.

Re: Lex Fridman Interviews Richard Feynman

#7
post #3
post #2

this is fucked up manufacturing content from the voices/faces of prominent people that have died is no bueno fuck podcast.ai

In all earnestness - why? It's not like anyone would be fooled into thinking this was real. What's the harm?

>not like anyone would be fooled into thinking this was real

my god, are you asleep?

Re: Lex Fridman Interviews Richard Feynman

#8
post #2

this is fucked up manufacturing content from the voices/faces of prominent people that have died is no bueno fuck podcast.ai

You never get to close pandora's box. The only choice you have is how to decide to adapt to the new reality. Whining into the void about the new reality isn't adaptation. It's weakness.

This is such an insane worldview. Lots of things are technically possible but socially or legally discouraged. You could infringe copyright. You could steal. You could walk around naked. It's not whining to say that something is outside of social norms.

Re: Lex Fridman Interviews Richard Feynman

#9
post #3
post #2

this is fucked up manufacturing content from the voices/faces of prominent people that have died is no bueno fuck podcast.ai

In all earnestness - why? It's not like anyone would be fooled into thinking this was real. What's the harm?

> It's not like anyone would be fooled into thinking this was real. What's the harm?

You are grossly overestimating the collective intelligence of people on the Internet and yes this also includes the "wittier" Lex Fridman audience.

Post reply on HN