Star Trek (1964) [pdf]
leethomson.myzen.co.uk
Star Trek (1964) [pdf]
1–10 of 132 posts
Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]
#2Tons of echoes of things that happened later in the various series. This was a fun read. Thanks!
Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]
#3It’s amazing how far ahead this was, compared to everything else on TV at the time. And that last scenario kinda reminds me of…
Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]
#4Ronald D Moores “series bible” for battlestar galactica is also quite a fun read for fans. A copy is available from the same site, so clearly this person enjoys their sci fi.
http://leethomson.myzen.co.uk/Battlestar_Galactica/Battlesta...
Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]
#5Awesome collection! Pitch bible from He-Man Masters of the Universe is solid gold ;)
"Beyond the farthest galaxies viewed by the greatest telescopes on Earth. Beyond the limits of our universe lies another place - a place of magic, myth, sorcery and science. Through the cosmic clouds spins a solar system with a type three star twinkling in the ether of interstellar space. About the star rotate worlds inconceivable to mere mortal minds. They are populated by deities and demigods, sorcerers and sybils, men and women imbued with the powers of good and evil!"
Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]
#6The "president Capone" episode idea has turned out to be frighteningly prescient.
Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]
#7Even if you are not a fan, the PDF is a very enlightening read!
"...blonde with a shape even a uniform could not hide"
It's shockingly misogynistic!
Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]
#8Not a Star Trek related question, but I noticed that the title is printed in a special cursive font, while the rest of the document is typewritten. What kind of machine would have been used in 1964 to print a custom font for a one-off document?
Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]
#9Even if you are not a fan, the PDF is a very enlightening read! "...blonde with a shape even a uniform could not hide" It's shockingly misogynistic!
Young Kirk was pretty buff.
Re: Star Trek (1964) [pdf]
#10Not a Star Trek related question, but I noticed that the title is printed in a special cursive font, while the rest of the document is typewritten. What kind of machine would have been used in 1964 to print a custom font for a one-off document?
A pen, perhaps? Inksmanship, drafting, lettering all were much more common skills.
Could also be stickers, hot metal typesetting (unlikely), or even phototypesetting.