The debate over whether aging is a disease rages on
technologyreview.com
The debate over whether aging is a disease rages on
1–4 of 4 posts
Re: The debate over whether aging is a disease rages on
#2Re: The debate over whether aging is a disease rages on
#3I'm on board with curing aging-related illnesses, just not aging itself, which is definitely not a disease. It's humanity's single most important pillar. Looking at it like a disease is completely misguided. Humanity wouldn't be able to exist without aging. Aging is the key to everything.
> a disorder of structure or function in a human, animal, or plant, especially one that produces specific signs or symptoms or that affects a specific location and is not simply a direct result of physical injury.
Why do you consider aging not a disease? AFAICT, the degradation and signs it causes seem to tick the definitional boxes.
I was surprised to see this opinion originating from you, @Comevius. I've grown accustomed to finding myself in violent agreement with ye. :)
Re: The debate over whether aging is a disease rages on
#4I'm on board with curing aging-related illnesses, just not aging itself, which is definitely not a disease. It's humanity's single most important pillar. Looking at it like a disease is completely misguided. Humanity wouldn't be able to exist without aging. Aging is the key to everything.
> disease (n.) > a disorder of structure or function in a human, animal, or plant, especially one that produces specific signs or symptoms or that affects a specific location and is not simply a direct result of physical injury. Why do you consider aging not a disease? AFAICT, the degradation and signs it causes seem to tick the definitional boxes. I was surprised to see this opinion originating from you, @Comevius.…