Codeberg: A GitHub alternative from Europe
1–10 of 220 posts
Re: Codeberg: A GitHub alternative from Europe
#2It was only days after the project maintainer contacted them that they wrote something back about an IP complaint from Wikimedia foundation.
Re: Codeberg: A GitHub alternative from Europe
#3Re: Codeberg: A GitHub alternative from Europe
#4Re: Codeberg: A GitHub alternative from Europe
#5Codeberg is working on CI and you can request early access. I've found it to work well and fast.
Re: Codeberg: A GitHub alternative from Europe
#6Codeberg recently took down the repository for Wikiless project without any explanation to the project. It was only days after the project maintainer contacted them that they wrote something back about an IP complaint from Wikimedia foundation.
Re: Codeberg: A GitHub alternative from Europe
#7Codeberg recently took down the repository for Wikiless project without any explanation to the project. It was only days after the project maintainer contacted them that they wrote something back about an IP complaint from Wikimedia foundation.
I really don't get why do every org do this. A simple mail about the takedown to the owner with few lines explaining the situation shouldn't be difficult, and I would say it is the best ROI to prevent PR damage like this.
Re: Codeberg: A GitHub alternative from Europe
#8its pretty much a modified instance of Gitea with a small, privacy-friendly German Gmhb behind it. Still like it a lot. Wish more developers at the very least set up mirrors on either Codeberg or Sourcehut.
Re: Codeberg: A GitHub alternative from Europe
#9Re: Codeberg: A GitHub alternative from Europe
#10Codeberg recently took down the repository for Wikiless project without any explanation to the project. It was only days after the project maintainer contacted them that they wrote something back about an IP complaint from Wikimedia foundation.
I really don't get why do every org do this. A simple mail about the takedown to the owner with few lines explaining the situation shouldn't be difficult, and I would say it is the best ROI to prevent PR damage like this.
When people who submit these complaints don't feel like you acquiesced in their favor they will assemble and call you out. Your service will be known as a safe harbor for groups of ill repute and eventually you may be forced to shutter the service because you're now known as the person enabling groups of ill repute.
I'm not saying it's right, I'm saying that's the cycle that history shows takes place. It seems effective at chilling the content in question and the service providers who serve it.
Examples: voat, rumble, Nchan, Nch, parler, the list goes on.