Live data from Hacker News

Focker is a FreeBSD image/jail orchestration tool in the vein of Docker

github.com

1–10 of 11 posts

Re: Focker is a FreeBSD image/jail orchestration tool in the vein of Docker

#3
post #2

Is the author some sort of anti lockdown person? From the licence: https://github.com/sadaszewski/focker/blob/master/LICENSE#L9

Worth noting loud and clear that this project is obviously non-free despite of being disguised as GPLv3.

Re: Focker is a FreeBSD image/jail orchestration tool in the vein of Docker

#7
post #2

Is the author some sort of anti lockdown person? From the licence: https://github.com/sadaszewski/focker/blob/master/LICENSE#L9

Worth noting loud and clear that this project is obviously non-free despite of being disguised as GPLv3.

> If the Program as you received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is governed by this License along with a term that is a further restriction, you may remove that term.

https://github.com/sadaszewski/focker/blob/f3b268af46d46c669...

Re: Focker is a FreeBSD image/jail orchestration tool in the vein of Docker

#8
post #2

Is the author some sort of anti lockdown person? From the licence: https://github.com/sadaszewski/focker/blob/master/LICENSE#L9

definitely, he somehow thinks he can have two incompatible licenses on the same piece of software. Does that invalidate both of them?

Re: Focker is a FreeBSD image/jail orchestration tool in the vein of Docker

#9
The author seems to be some kind of weirdo, fantasizing about "totalitarianism" while meaning reasonable Covid measures. The addendum about this renders the software non-free.

I wouldn't trust this software, as much as I wouldn't trust software from QAnon, Putin or North Korea.

Re: Focker is a FreeBSD image/jail orchestration tool in the vein of Docker

#10

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Worth noting loud and clear that this project is obviously non-free despite of being disguised as GPLv3.

> If the Program as you received it, or any part of it, contains a notice stating that it is governed by this License along with a term that is a further restriction, you may remove that term. https://github.com/sadaszewski/focker/blob/f3b268af46d46c669...

If you receive a GPLv3 licensed application from someone else who tried to add additional restrictions, then you can just ignore them, sure. However, this comes straight from the author, so what you actually get here are two conflicting rules given by the copyright holder. I'm afraid this can not be considered free unless a relevant jurisdiction's court judges otherwise.
Post reply on HN