Live data from Hacker News

OpenWrt 22.03

openwrt.org

1–10 of 133 posts

Re: OpenWrt 22.03

#2
This is a pretty significant release - it marks the end of iptables in the main distribution; the OpenWrt-specific translation layer (previously firewall3, now firewall4) for netfilter-related configuration now targets nftables. Also, yet more devices have made the switch from swconfig to DSA for configuring Ethernet switches.

I've been using 22.03 release candidates on all my networking gear (router, switch, access point) for several weeks without problems, and can only recommend giving OpenWrt a chance :)

Re: OpenWrt 22.03

#4
I really do miss the alliteration-based naming scheme ("attitude adjustment", "barrier breaker", "chaos calmer"...) they had before the LEDE merge.

Re: OpenWrt 22.03

#5
Really enjoy OpenWrt. One complaint/suggestion is they really need official Ansible support or some better way at automating deployments. I was able to create something myself for the time being but having official support would make things so much better.

Re: OpenWrt 22.03

#7
post #4

I really do miss the alliteration-based naming scheme ("attitude adjustment", "barrier breaker", "chaos calmer"...) they had before the LEDE merge.

What about the mixed drinks? I think it was only White Russian and Kamikaze.

Re: OpenWrt 22.03

#9
post #4

I really do miss the alliteration-based naming scheme ("attitude adjustment", "barrier breaker", "chaos calmer"...) they had before the LEDE merge.

Looks like the OpenWrt `/etc/banner` no longer includes a bartender recipe (which I think they had since before alliteration, including for White Russian).

I once included one of the OpenWrt login banners in a "screenshot" for the Racket community, and neglected to explain why alcohol was involved: https://www.neilvandyke.org/racket-openwrt/

Re: OpenWrt 22.03

#10

Really enjoy OpenWrt. One complaint/suggestion is they really need official Ansible support or some better way at automating deployments. I was able to create something myself for the time being but having official support would make things so much better.

That sounds awfully like something OpenWISP should already be capable of.
Post reply on HN