Live data from Hacker News

Lenovo’s second foldable PC addresses the first’s biggest problems

arstechnica.com

1–10 of 13 posts

Re: Lenovo’s second foldable PC addresses the first’s biggest problems

#3
Maybe it is just me, but:

>I appreciate that Lenovo designed the PC so it could be open by anyone. You can use a heat gun to release the adhesive securing the woven-plastic plates and pop them off.

I would like to see a video where the Author of the article (Scharon Harding) proceeds to use a heat gun to open the thingy, changes something inside and then re-closes/re-glues it correctly and without damages.

Re: Lenovo’s second foldable PC addresses the first’s biggest problems

#5
I think they missed a bit by upping the total weight to ~4.2 lbs, and not making the keyboard "sandwichable" like Gen 1 (so you can just open it in clamshell mode directly, they keyboard now seems to attach on the outside via a bulky stand).

BTW Gen 1 seems to currently be on sale (on Amazon) for ~1100 USD in the US.

Re: Lenovo’s second foldable PC addresses the first’s biggest problems

#6

I want this. But the CPU is massively underpowered at just 1.4Ghz. They should have gone with ryzen. Also it costs almost 5000 euros in my country, that's honestly insane.

Correction I looked wrong. The price "starts at" 3500$, still insane, and the CPU is even weaker then I thought. 1.1Ghz.

Re: Lenovo’s second foldable PC addresses the first’s biggest problems

#8
post #7
post #2

I already have a foldable pc. It's called a laptop. But then all my TVs have been 3D (X/Y/time). So maybe I'm too pedantic.

You should try a color TV sometime, they're really something!

Well white is a colour. Technically all the colours.

Did I mention I was pedantic?

Re: Lenovo’s second foldable PC addresses the first’s biggest problems

#10
post #8
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You should try a color TV sometime, they're really something!

Well white is a colour. Technically all the colours. Did I mention I was pedantic?

My point, which I'm not sure if you got so forgive me if you did, was that unless all your TVs have been 1-bit monochrome, each RGB pixel represents a 3D vector space all by itself. Your "3D" TVs are actually 7D!

And since we're being pedantic, white cannot both be "a color" and "all the colors" at the same time - in fact it's never "all the colors"! We are either using "color" as a shorthand for wavelength, in which case there's no such wavelength (yet merely 3 are sufficient to produce an impression of white, certainly not all of them), or "color" means the subjective impression produced, in which case the various shades of white comprise a narrow subset of these.

Did I mention I was pedantic? :)

Post reply on HN