Maintainer of open-source project Orthanc asked to show proof of ISO compliance
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: Maintainer of open-source project Orthanc asked to show proof of ISO compliance
#2The maintainer could respond with an offer to underake certification and bill for his time, or invite them to try get it certified on their own on account of the project being open source.
Re: Maintainer of open-source project Orthanc asked to show proof of ISO compliance
#3Re: Maintainer of open-source project Orthanc asked to show proof of ISO compliance
#4Well, seems fair to ask. It could already have been certified, as far as they know. The maintainer could respond with an offer to underake certification and bill for his time, or invite them to try get it certified on their own on account of the project being open source.
Examples abound. Came across this one recently: https://github.com/archtechx/tenancy/issues/654#issuecomment...
Re: Maintainer of open-source project Orthanc asked to show proof of ISO compliance
#5Well, seems fair to ask. It could already have been certified, as far as they know. The maintainer could respond with an offer to underake certification and bill for his time, or invite them to try get it certified on their own on account of the project being open source.
I do not consider it a reasonable request. The burden to maintain an open-source project is already heavy and entitled users should be flagged whenever possible. Examples abound. Came across this one recently: https://github.com/archtechx/tenancy/issues/654#issuecomment...
As for your example, I'm sorry, but I'm not impressed by maintainers who act like fainting divas because people don't use the right tone with them. That's just thin skinned.